Grand Forks Part II
-
Joel;268804 wrote:
It stopped snowing, and the river didn't raise...
So I guess I don't understand Where all these idiotic predictions come from. We get all this snow, and its supposedly going to crest in Mid April? That doesnt make any sense. This snow is gonna stay around for 2 weeks before it melts? You can quote me on this.
ITS GOING TO RECREST LATE THIS WEEK AT LESS THAN 37 FEET.Also, if you look at the radar, there is a crap ton of snow falling within a half mile of fargo.
http://www.weather.com/weather/map/interactive/58103?from=36hr_topnav_undeclared
Give it an hour, we will have it hard again. They are saying a total depth of 12-18" of snow. And this snow is wet snow, not low water content snow. Thats nothing to sneeze at. Plus what I mentioned in the previouse post. I hope you are right. I'm sick of water/sand bags/crabby people, lolI don't think you will be right though.
-
94NDTA;268812 wrote:
I also beleive a lot of it has to do with the even larger amount of snow NE SD is getting. Plus they are expecting another snow/rain storm in a week + warmer weather.EDIT: Chuck beat me to it.
20 inches of snow already
-
Parker;268818 wrote:
starts warming up on Saturday, 40% chance of rain saturday and sunday...
5 day forecast is as accurate as drawing conditions out of a hat -
STiSchucky;268825 wrote:
5 day forecast is as accurate as drawing conditions out of a hatthe next five days will be a high of 35 and a low of 16 with a 5-20 mph wind with a 40% chance of percipitation... the hardest part about that is pointing to the right part of the blue screen
does anyone know if whap is predicting a surge yet? or at all?
-
Yay, the NWS finally stopped smoking crack... Steady decline til April 7th http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ahps2/hydrograph.php?wfo=fgf&gage=fgon8&view=1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
Although, I think it will drop even faster than that.
Say that From A to B is one Foot of water. B to C is one foot, C to D is one foot.
The Amount of water from C to D is considerably less than from A to B. Everytime it drops another foot closer to its banks, it has to cover less width, which in turn is less water. Pretty simple. For this reason, It should be dropping at a continually faster rate every foot it gets closer to being back in its banks -
joel;268838 wrote:
yay, the nws finally stopped smoking crack... Steady decline til april 7th http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ahps2/hydrograph.php?wfo=fgf&gage=fgon8&view=1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1
although, i think it will drop even faster than that.
say that from a to b is one foot of water. B to c is one foot, c to d is one foot.
The amount of water from c to d is considerably less than from a to b. Everytime it drops another foot closer to its banks, it has to cover less width, which in turn is less water. Pretty simple. For this reason, it should be dropping at a continually faster rate every foot it gets closer to being back in its bankshogwash, newtons first law says otherwise
here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2- 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
-
DelSlow;268859 wrote:
So according to that...'graph'...the Red River is convex all the way through the FM area? Hmmm...
No, actually that just inside the riverbed. If you look at it at floodstage, it would look like this. or atleast this is how it is in my backyard.
No Mouse FTL... -
those graphs are sweet. mspaint>technology
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login