Grand Forks Part II
-
SPANISH-RICE;269702 wrote:
i hope your grades are where you want them to be then because if they cancel anymore school theyve jsut ended the semester with those grades beforeyep... and that's fine with me... i just want to have my fucking degree... 1 more month...
-
bubba;269701 wrote:
I just hope it comes up enough to cancel school another couple weeks...ugh, i hope if that happens that both concordia and NDSU close down. It'd be a pain to have to stay up here an extra month just to go to 2 classes.
-
slow90gsx;269779 wrote:
By the sounds of it walaker dosent like the Hesko have you guys heard anything good or bad?we like the hescos because of the versitility and time it takes to get them done.
now the price is a different story. i think the city was paying around 500 dollars for 15ft sections. the hescos are great but they have their downsides.
Wheres Joel in all this? maybe he can tell us what the river will crest at?
-
Moorhead displays its utter stupidty again by startin to build a dike on 8th st.
God who are the morons getting overpaid to think this childish shit up. Put the stupid dike on 4th st, then leave 1 lane open on it cause its a 1way anyways.
Fuckin idiots.
-
Plus the hescos leak kinda. if you put them on the street they are way better then putting them on the grass or mud. they weigh a ton and with the saturated ground the end up leaking. they did use them in hurricane katrina and according to the president of the company, which was here in town last week, they say that the hesco lasted there and never broke. it was their permanant dikes.
-
DelSlow;269780 wrote:
I don't know why he wouldn't? They are cheap and crazy fast to fill compared to other methods.Ummmm NO. They are spendy and they leak at the bottoms. There are some areas in Iowa that were/are in the process of buying them for flood control but may have cancelled their order because of the statements from certain people in our area.
I heard in our area that the city originally purchased $450,000 worth of them in the beginning. Since then I heard they have 7 miles in place. The cost per lineal foot is over $35, that puts the purchase price well over $1,000,000.00
Like someone told me they are good for stopping bullits, not water. The only good thing about them is they do go up quickly.
-
Rexwagon;269786 wrote:
Plus the hescos leak kinda. if you put them on the street they are way better then putting them on the grass or mud. they weigh a ton and with the saturated ground the end up leaking. they did use them in hurricane katrina and according to the president of the company, which was here in town last week, they say that the hesco lasted there and never broke. it was their permanant dikes.The ones I installed sealed up better on the grass/dirt vs. concrete. The reps. were on sight when we put them up. Ours were on the first load to show up in Fargo. They had nothing better to do so they came out just to see that they were being installed properly.
-
I c. so I looking at the probability graph of water heights from the NWS, and its not looking good.
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ahps2/weekly.php?wfo=fgf&gage=fgon8&view=1,1,1,1,1,1&toggles=10,7,8,2,9,15,6it looks like a 90% chance of going 41ft. wtf
-
DelSlow;269793 wrote:
You do know that they just don't up up Hesco's and that's it right? They pack clay around them...I think for how fast they go up, the amount of protection they give, and how ***relatively ***cheap they are; they are pretty damn decent.
You dumbfuck they packed clay because they leaked. QUIT posting in this thread when you absolutly have no fucking clue what you are talking about.
Sorry about the rant to all else.............
-
Because they leaked? I have Hesco's by my house and they have had clay on them since day 1. Why don't we ask Rex what they do with the barriers right away, as I think he has more experience and knows more about them than both of us. I do love how everyone is so quick to throw out personal attack for stating options. Cry me a fucking river. Sorry I forgot, if you loose a house to a flood you instantly know everything there is to know about any/all barriers.
Jesus Christ, grow up.
-
Rexwagon;269795 wrote:
I c. so I looking at the probability graph of water heights from the NWS, and its not looking good.
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ahps2/weekly.php?wfo=fgf&gage=fgon8&view=1,1,1,1,1,1&toggles=10,7,8,2,9,15,6it looks like a 90% chance of going 41ft. wtf
do you honestly believe that? Its all off of historical data. They wont have a clear prognostication until they see what happens this weekend when theres a signficant warm up and the majority of snow melts.Either way I would put 0 stock into the NWS. They botched the 41-42 potentially 43 prediction in just 12 hours, what gives you confidence theyll be right, 2 and a half weeks away?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login