Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. Run Your Mouth
  4. Reagan- More liberal than we give him credit for?

Reagan- More liberal than we give him credit for?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Run Your Mouth
31 Posts 10 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MisterCMKM Offline
    MisterCMKM Offline
    MisterCMK
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Parker;285838 wrote:
    you fail at stirring....

    He sings the same subsidy song every time...

    FASTER THAN DUBBSY

    > thrash;315544 wrote:
    > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
    >
    > Ford is back :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • GrrG Offline
      GrrG Offline
      Grr
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      chuck, this is a good topic to me since i am currently about 1/2 way through the 700 page "The Reagan Diaries" edited by Douglas Brinkley. All i have to say is, go buy the book, almost everything you listed in the first post is basically wrong, in his diary he clearly was opposed to everything you are faulting him on, but the VERY democratic congress played alot of games with him and they did finally have to make some concessions. He also remarks on how his "tax increase" which wasnt much of a tax increase, was only a percentage of what the democrats, namely Tip O'neil were trying to pass. Im not gonna waste my time finding quotes i read 200 pages back, so i just suggest spending the $20 on it, very well worth having around
      Gary

      2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
      2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        Trafik Jamz
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        He still signed off on every item I posted Gary, meaning that he gave it his final ok.

        Just because a book states one thing doesn't change the fact that he signed every one of those things into law.

        Yes, I'm sure O'neil wanted a larger tax increase, but the affect of his tax increase in 1982 was that it was a larger increase (based on GDP) than Clinton's. But, TEFRA was led by none other than Bob Dole (republican from Kansas)

        SOURCE=http://www.ctj.org/html/taxvotes.htm

        The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981.

        The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981(ERTA) embodied the "supply-side" vision of the newly elected President Ronald Reagan. ERTA was designed to reduce federal tax collections by $872.6 billion over the 1981-86 period. Among the provisions of ERTA were:

        * An across-the-board reduction in personal income tax rates of 25 percent, phased in over three years.
        * Dozens of new corporate tax breaks, led by a new system of depreciation that actually produced negative effective tax rates on the profits from new investments.
        * A reduction in the top estate tax rate and a phased-in increase in the exemption.
        * Numerous new tax breaks for individuals with savings.
        

        Many of the corporate tax breaks enacted in ERTA were ultimately repealed by loophole-closing legislation later in the 1980s. The long-term legacy of the 1981 Act including declining federal tax revenues, decreased progressivity in the federal tax system and a much higher national debt.

        The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) of 1982.

        Soon after the enactment of the 1981 tax cuts, the economy entered a deep recession, as the Federal Reserve tightened monetary policy in response to the huge budget deficits that the tax cuts engendered. Meanwhile, stories about widespread corporate tax avoidance stemming from the 1981 corporate tax breaks were causing a public outcry. Congressional tax-policy makers, led by Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.), decided that many of the 1981-enacted corporate tax loopholes would have to be scaled back to address the deficit problem and get the economy back on track. Following passage of the 1982 Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act, the Fed lowered interest rates and the economy began to recover from the 1981-82 recession. The bill's revenue-increasing, loophole-closing measures also helped provide a blueprint for the larger-scale loophole-closing provisions later enacted in the 1986 Tax Reform Act.

        The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (DEFRA)

        The tax provisions of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 represented Congress's continued efforts to stem rising federal budget deficits. The bill added $103 billion to revenues over five years, mainly by loophole-closing measures directed at corporate tax abuses.

        The Tax Reform Act of 1986

        The Tax Reform Act of 1986 was a monumental piece of tax reform legislation designed to close loopholes and lower income tax rates, while maintaining revenues and enhancing progressivity. The bill curbed the most egregious high-income and corporate tax shelters that had become endemic after the 1981 supply-side tax act, and turned hundreds of large, profitable corporate tax freeloaders back into corporate taxpayers again. Overall, the bill closed an estimated $500 billion in loopholes over five years, and used those revenues to reduce tax rates.

        The bill reduced personal income taxes for all income groups, including a major expansion of the earned-income tax credit for low-income working families. Despite a sharp reduction in the corporate tax rate, the bill's corporate loophole-closing measures increased net corporate tax payments by enough to offset the personal tax cuts.

        The key House vote on the Tax Reform Act came on December 11, 1985, when the House voted on passage of its version of the measure. Realizing that the bill represented a fundamental reversal of the loophole mentality that underlay the 1981 tax act, recalcitrant supply-siders in the House led a revolt against the bill. In fact, they succeeded in defeating the rule allowing House consideration of the measure. Only intense lobbying by the Reagan administration (which had repudiated its enthusiasm for loopholes after 1981) was able to reverse that defeat on the House floor. The bill was passed and sent to the Senate a few days later. In mid-1986, the House and Senate passed the Tax Reform Act of 1986, and it was signed by President Reagan.

        The Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act of 1987.

        This was the first House vote on taxes after passage of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Trying to stay true to the spirit of tax reform, the House Ways and Means Committee reported a bill to the House floor that avoided any significant changes in personal income taxes other than a measure capping mortgage interest deductions at $1 million in debt. Most of the revenues needed to meet the budget targets were raised through further corporate tax reforms, plus small increases in various federal excise taxes. As a result, the overall bill was generally progressive in its distribution, although the deficit reduction achieved by the bill was comparatively modest.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          Trafik Jamz
          wrote on last edited by
          #20
          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            Trafik Jamz
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            I guess the question is: Do closing loopholes count as raising taxes? In my world, yes.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • DrifterExtremeD Offline
              DrifterExtremeD Offline
              DrifterExtreme
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              Trafik Jamz;285929 wrote:
              I guess the question is: Do closing loopholes count as raising taxes? In my world, yes.

              LOL.....

              legacy image

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                Trafik Jamz
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                IOW, if someone takes away one of my deductions/write offs that I've had for a number of years (leased cars for example) and now I have to pay extra taxes because of it, then yes....it is a tax increase on me.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • DrifterExtremeD Offline
                  DrifterExtremeD Offline
                  DrifterExtreme
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  How is a loophole a deduction? please clearify.

                  legacy image

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Link
                    Banned
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Because you don't have to pay it?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Trafik Jamz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Exactly, a loophole is nothing more than a deduction...until someone doesn't like it

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • DaveHD Offline
                        DaveHD Offline
                        DaveH
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        Trafik Jamz;285958 wrote:
                        Exactly, a loophole is nothing more than a deduction...until someone doesn't like it

                        I would say a loophole is more of an oversight in the writing of the law, than an actual deduction.

                        Now that I have Chucks attention, can I get access to the "protected" forum here? Pretty please?

                        :drunken_smilie:

                        DaveH
                        '94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph

                        legacy image

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • DrifterExtremeD Offline
                          DrifterExtremeD Offline
                          DrifterExtreme
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          DaveH;285961 wrote:
                          I would say a loophole is more of an oversight in the writing of the law, than an actual deduction.

                          ....

                          legacy image

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            Trafik Jamz
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            DaveH;285961 wrote:
                            Now that I have Chucks attention, can I get access to the "protected" forum here? Pretty please?

                            :drunken_smilie:

                            First you have to find someone who will vouch for you.......

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • GrrG Offline
                              GrrG Offline
                              Grr
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              chuck you have to read the book, im not gonna read it to you. Reagan is one of only 4 or 5 presidents ever to take a daily diary, and the book is the exact diary he wrote, no editing. I will choose to beleive the ACTUAL words written by reagan himself, with descriptions of what happened and why, over what you gathered by reading the bill. Fact is he had to sign it, they did everything they could to get his full plan implemented, but there was no choice but to sign in a very watered down, and not ideal law, happens all the time and this is no different.

                              2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                              2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DaveHD Offline
                                DaveHD Offline
                                DaveH
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                Trafik Jamz;285964 wrote:
                                First you have to find someone who will vouch for you.......

                                damn, I'm screwed....

                                DaveH
                                '94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph

                                legacy image

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                Register Login
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups