1990 SHO turbo vs 2004 cadillac CTS-V

[GHETTOBEAST]

check out this vid. crazy 388hp tauras

myweb.cableone.net/ryant/turbosho.wmv copy and paste into browser

[torbs]

Go S-ho

[King Ricer]

total sleeper

[btleier]

I'd still take the Caddy

[GarageAlchemist]

i'd take the SHO myself

[91nbtsi]

Definately take the Caddy. Just the sound of the ugly a** taurus disgusts me...heh

[DelSlow]

Pos

[DelSlow]

SHo that is

[torbs]

speed > looks

pwned

[91nbtsi]

torbs wrote:
speed > looks

pwned

Brand new CTS with LS6>>>Old POS with a turbo

[GHETTOBEAST]

i just like the video because its a car you dont normally see turboed and its a tauras SHO 1st gen too

[adog]

91nbtsi wrote:
Brand new CTS with LS6>>>Old POS with a turbo

He's got quite a point. Plus if you really felt like it, FI works all right with the LSX engines.

[torbs]

91nbtsi wrote:
Brand new CTS with LS6>>>Old POS with a turbo

bah! nate, speed is still better than looks...muah!

[91nbtsi]

Can't beat speed and looks! Just like my talon I had, it was fast, and I look good! haha. JK. I think it is cool that the SHO is quick, but no way in hell I would choose it over a CTS V. End of story!

[torbs]

haha, yea, if i could shoose between the 2 and price wasnt an issue, then id go with the CTS...but i wont be able to afford one for 20 years, so thats y im stickin the the S-HO

[My NOva]

91nbtsi wrote:
Can't beat speed and looks! Just like my talon I had, it was fast, and I look good! haha. JK. I think it is cool that the SHO is quick, but no way in hell I would choose it over a CTS V. End of story!
that would be enuf said that sho is fast

[DelSlow]

torbs wrote:
speed > looks

pwned

torbert your an idiot.

[DelSlow]

SHOs are ugly as hell

[IridePSI]

Did you here that thing, dang, kinda cool lookin too not to mention. Mad E-Props. Woooooot

[drift86]

torbs wrote:
bah! nate, speed is still better than looks...muah!
thats why you got a dsm (there are a few out there that do look ok but they arent the best styled)