Packers....
-
allen just earned his entire contract in that game
-
damn, so allen made 75,000,000sh last night?
-
STiSchucky;290603 wrote:
damn, so allen made 75,000,000sh last night?yea, he was also given a gulf stream, coupons for pizza hut (buy one get one of equal or lesser value free) and an open invitation to turn your sister inside out.
-
rexwagon;290614 wrote:
packers suck. Favre is the man+1
99civic;290622 wrote:
that game kicked ass! First time i actually watched a full vikings game and was exited+1
kossick;290623 wrote:
just lol'd at work. Nice+1
*1989 Nissan 300ZX Z31 *
> DelSlow;262050 wrote:
> I like the new JN210 -
Despite having a horrible o-line to protect him, Rodgers still threw for 384 yards, 2 TD's and 1 Int. Jared Allen lit him up plenty of times but he still stood in there and was pretty consistent on getting the ball moving with accuracy (26/37)
GB also held Peterson to just 2.2 yards per carry on 55 attempts, held favre to 271 yards passing, though he did throw 3 TD's.
Ryan Grant went for ~5 yards per carry, though was grossly under utilized as an RB in my opinion.
With a healthier line, I think the game would have been a lot closer and I'm not convinced that if that last onside kick would have gone GB's way, the outcome of the game wouldn't have been different.
Long story short: Good game MN, it wasn't the blowout that I thought it would be w/ Favre/Peterson racking up a huge lead.
-
Trafik Jamz;290627 wrote:
Despite having a horrible o-line to protect him, Rodgers still threw for 384 yards, 2 TD's and 1 Int. Jared Allen lit him up plenty of times but he still stood in there and was pretty consistent on getting the ball moving with accuracy (26/37)GB also held Peterson to just 2.2 yards per carry on 55 attempts, held favre to 271 yards passing, though he did throw 3 TD's.
Ryan Grant went for ~5 yards per carry, though was grossly under utilized as an RB in my opinion.
With a healthier line, I think the game would have been a lot closer and I'm not convinced that if that last onside kick would have gone GB's way, the outcome of the game wouldn't have been different.
Long story short: Good game MN, it wasn't the blowout that I thought it would be w/ Favre/Peterson racking up a huge lead.
if.
but.
No, Green Bay is light year's behind Minnesota and every Packer fan knows it. AP has a piss poor game and the Vikes still dominate. The Pack will go 7-9, 8-8 if they get lucky.
-
Aaron Rodgers did a pretty awesome job in my opinion. The better team won, though. Jared Allen was unstoppable (4.5 sacks), let alone the Vikings Defense as a whole... 8 sacks. And did you SEE that Goal Line defense?!?!?
IMO the Vikings absolutely dominated the 2nd and 3rd quarter. They let the Pack get back in it, through some stellar play by Rodgers. A very rare AP fumble gave them 7. Two onside kicks went our way. It could have easily been a much closer game... but I'm still basking in victory. Good job Green Bay, but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.
-
ok it was a rare strip. usually he just drops the ball nicely on the ground for the other team to scoop up.
Anyways, the packers couldnt compete with the vikings. they made Favre beat them and he did. Aaron rogers did well but he still didnt do that good. how many times did he drop back and not get the ball out on time? thats why he gets sacked and hit 50 times a game. Tjack does the same thing except he still cant make passes like rogers can.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login