U.S. Debtclock Update
-
24valvenotak;295684 wrote:
im all for it, everyone with a republican mindset move south, again.It would actually be a country between a country...it's the south and the midwest. http://www.lawpundit.com/blog/PresidentialElectionCNN5Nov2008.png
And if we did it, the country with the democratic mindset would be totally bankrupt within in a short time as all of the rich people that lived there would move to a place where they could keep more of their money...Oh wait, this is already happening, see: New York and California
If being a liberal is so great, then why is it that the liberal states are the ones with the most dire financial problems?
-
24valvenotak;295684 wrote:
im all for it, everyone with a republican mindset move south, again.I have a "freedom" mindset. Where do i move?
In any case, last time a bunch of sepratists wanted to leave the USA, the USA got pretty upset about it and fought to keep them. You'll have to forgive me for not beleiving that the looters would leave the producers alone this time.
-
thrash;295691 wrote:
I have a "freedom" mindset. Where do i move?Right next to me, I'd be glad to have you as a neighbor.
What I think is funny about this whole thing is that the whole debate/bitching (in this thread) started when Zac said:
zbrown;295542 wrote:
how come i keep hearing on how we are fixing the un-financially sound practices of the last 8 years then??so either you are lying or the current administration is lying.... and there is no way they would do that
and I showed how spending grew under Bush (and should be changed). I'll be the first to admit that Obama isn't doing any better job. So yes...the current administration is lying in saying that they are keeping spending under tighter control. I never once said it wasn't.
-
DaveH;295699 wrote:
I did not cut down that cherry tree.Oh wait....
:icon_bigsmurf:
lol
thrash there is always outer space or international waters?
-
Trafik Jamz;295694 wrote:
and I showed how spending grew under Bush (and should be changed). I'll be the first to admit that Obama isn't doing any better job. So yes...the current administration is lying in saying that they are keeping spending under tighter control. I never once said it wasn't.You know, I believe the majority of people on this board that consider themselves conservative did not like Bush and the amount he was spending. So telling us that he was doing a bad job is like preaching to the choir.
The Obama Administration is taking the negatives of the Bush Administration and putting them on steroids.
Also, pointing to negatives of others in the past to negatives that are happening now is not an excuse that should be tolerated. What people want is somebody that isn't about politics as usual, and that actually cares about the country and people more than their own political interests.
-
torbs;295704 wrote:
You know, I believe the majority of people on this board that consider themselves conservative did not like Bush and the amount he was spending. So telling us that he was doing a bad job is like preaching to the choir.The Obama Administration is taking the negatives of the Bush Administration and putting them on steroids.
Also, pointing to negatives of others in the past to negatives that are happening now is not an excuse that should be tolerated. What people want is somebody that isn't about politics as usual, and that actually cares about the country and people more than their own political interests.
Didn't I just say this essentially? Twice? Can no one read on this damn forum?
-
Trafik Jamz;295710 wrote:
Didn't I just say this essentially? Twice? Can no one read on this damn forum?I just don't see the point in bringing up Bush whenever somebody brings up Obama's bad policies. It's as if Bush doing bad is an excuse for Obama doing bad (worse) as well. There are no excuses.
-
torbs;295716 wrote:
I just don't see the point in bringing up Bush whenever somebody brings up Obama's bad policies. It's as if Bush doing bad is an excuse for Obama doing bad (worse) as well. There are no excuses.I didn't bring up Bush. Zac did. I elaborated on it. Learn to read.
-
Trafik Jamz;295733 wrote:
I didn't bring up Bush. Zac did. I elaborated on it. Learn to read.Elaborate-Czar
I reread what you posted and I got it now...And as I saw in an earlier post of yours, I completely agree with that we shouldn't be arguing over what Bush did...
My B.
-
Holy crap....Torbs and I are on the same page....weird
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login