Hottie driving G35coupe?
-
StangerBanger96;310664 wrote:
A thread about a random girl in a G35 coupe has/will turned into a debate about the similarities between incest and being gay! Awesome!I was thinking that as I was typing my last post. What if someone tells her someone started s thread about her and she joins into this shit storm? lollerskates!!!
I've gotta side with Thrash on this one, my old school values being what they are regardless of what the bible says. It is a contradiction to allow gays their individual right to marry and then turn around an deny my individual rights and force me to accept it. That said I'm still a little fuzzy on how incest is equivalent. -
capitlj;310686 wrote:
That said I'm still a little fuzzy on how incest is equivalent.2 consenting adult men should not have their right to BF eachother and marry eachother interfered with.
Just as 2 consenting adults should not have their right to do whatever and marry eachother, despite the fact that they are cousins/brothers and sisters/whatever.
That is his logic.
-
StangerBanger96;310664 wrote:
A thread about a random girl in a G35 coupe has/will turned into a debate about the similarities between incest and being gay! Awesome!I was thinking that as I was typing my last post. What if someone tells her someone started s thread about her and she joins into this shit storm? lollerskates!!!
I've gotta side with Thrash on this one, my old school values being what they are regardless of what the bible says. It is a contradiction to allow gays their individual right to marry and then turn around an deny my individual rights and force me to accept it. That said I'm still a little fuzzy on how incest is equivalent. -
PSiedTSi;310678 wrote:
It's a more reliable source than the bible so atleast his posts got more informative as they went on....I mentioned the bible since morality was under discussion. Everyone has a standard that they derive their standard of morality from; the Bible is used by the majority of Americans.
Plus, You CAN marry your family members Thrash. It ISN'T outlawed everywhere. http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=4266
That only covers cousins, and note how many places where it is illegal. What about brother/sister, mother/son, etc?
-
dont got a ride;310679 wrote:
you're right. i probably dont anymore seeing its been 2 years since ive been on it, or tried using it. doesnt bother me any.If you don't want to seem like such a dumbass, stop celebrating your ignorance so publicly.
I searched for "Texas sodomy law" and the 1st hit was a wikipedia article on sodomy laws around the world. 2 clicks got me to the link i posted.
I happened to remember that the supreme court struck down a law in texas related to homosexuality, so that's why i searched for what I did.
It has nothing to do with wikipedia being accurate or not, it's called having even a passing knowledge of supreme court cases that affect the subject at hand. Ignore the wikipedia link. Search on the words in the link title, which will give you the supreme court decision you can read for yourself.
-
StangerBanger96;310664 wrote:
A thread about a random girl in a G35 coupe has/will turned into a debate about the similarities between incest and being gay! Awesome!This,
Still waiting on some fucking pics...
rule #1 - Don't start a thread about a "hot chick" and not post nude or at least scantly clad photos
dont got a ride;310675 wrote:
wait, Cobra Rob what, i swear he is here somewhere. he must know Thrash's password...wikipedia is not a reliable source, i can go on there and make up whatever bullshit i want and say its true. learned that at west fargo. :icon_cheers:
oh no not another "im gunna post a link to some bullshit no one cares about and say you has a small brain" post
really, go home and fuck off
Umm... he had a well worded and good post... ur prob just pissed cause you didn't wanna read it all or couldn't comprehend what he was saying...
-
thrash;310708 wrote:
If you don't want to seem like such a dumbass, stop celebrating your ignorance so publicly.I searched for "Texas sodomy law" and the 1st hit was a wikipedia article on sodomy laws around the world. 2 clicks got me to the link i posted.
I happened to remember that the supreme court struck down a law in texas related to homosexuality, so that's why i searched for what I did.
It has nothing to do with wikipedia being accurate or not, it's called having even a passing knowledge of supreme court cases that affect the subject at hand. Ignore the wikipedia link. Search on the words in the link title, which will give you the supreme court decision you can read for yourself.
That requires knowing the word "sodomy" though...
-
capitlj;310696 wrote:
I was thinking that as I was typing my last post. What if someone tells her someone started s thread about her and she joins into this shit storm? lollerskates!!!
I've gotta side with Thrash on this one, my old school values being what they are regardless of what the bible says. It is a contradiction to allow gays their individual right to marry and then turn around an deny my individual rights and force me to accept it. That said I'm still a little fuzzy on how incest is equivalent.nobody said accept it. tolerate it. isnt that what america is for? free of persecution? no offense, but the reason there is a homosexuality debate is because people are intolerant of it...
-
I can tolerate your sexual preference but like thrash said they are behaving as if we owe them certain individual rights, but not as individuals as a group. Put it this way, if a gay man comes into your church to worship and just keeps to himself about the fact he likes big hard cocks in or around his mouth, will anyone there care? I certainly wouldn't. Now that same gay man meets another like minded man and want to get married. Why should that same church be forced to perform a marriage that goes against it beliefs and the beliefs of its followers? That's not tolerance.
-
bubba;310710 wrote:
Umm... he had a well worded and good post... ur prob just pissed cause you didn't wanna read it all or couldn't comprehend what he was saying...not pissed at all actually
this
-
capitlj;310729 wrote:
I can tolerate your sexual preference but like thrash said they are behaving as if we owe them certain individual rights, but not as individuals as a group. Put it this way, if a gay man comes into your church to worship and just keeps to himself about the fact he likes big hard cocks in or around his mouth, will anyone there care? I certainly wouldn't. Now that same gay man meets another like minded man and want to get married. Why should that same church be forced to perform a marriage that goes against it beliefs and the beliefs of its followers? That's not tolerance.i didnt say the church should be forced to perform the ceremony. you dont have to be married in a church by a reverend, either. on the other hand, why even care? you probably arnt invited to the gay wedding anyway. i would think the church would jump at the chance to make another dollar, even if it was a gay dollar.
-
24valvenotak;310735 wrote:
i didnt say the church should be forced to perform the ceremony. you dont have to be married in a church by a reverend, either. on the other hand, why even care? you probably arnt invited to the gay wedding anyway. i would think the church would jump at the chance to make another dollar, even if it was a gay dollar.Especially considering churches are always screaming for more and more money.
Besides, homosexuals aren't capable of polluting the gene pool like incestuous couples...
-
You might not have said it but thats exactly the kind of thing Thrash was talking about. If you didn't catch that we're not having the same conversation. I'm not saying something so extreme as no Gays signs outside my stores, deep south 60's style, but there are individual rights that cannot be given to a group without taking them away from other individuals. You can substitute other groups and the results will be the same, its just that the Gay rights one is relevant now.
-
thrash;310706 wrote:
Correct.I'll make it realy easy.
Explain why gay marraige should be legal.
Now explain why a marraige between brother and sister should be illegal.
I got to here and decided to stop reading cause thats more than I wanna read. But to answer, 2 guys or 2 girls having sex doesnt ruin anyones lives, where as incest CAN lead to genetic defects which IS ruining someones life. Plain and simple, just because you are against being gay doesnt mean they shouldnt have rights like any other human being. Think about it, you sound just like every other stupid ass redneck from the south in the 1800's, instead of black people you are replacing it with gay people. They are a little different than you so you dont think its right, grow the fuck up, its 2010. Should gay people use different bathrooms or drinking fountains than straight people too??:icon_scratch:
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login