Fargostreet TOP 1/4 mile times

[Chirp5957]

new best 13.28 @ 104

[legacy-user-3898]

82 camaro 10.42 @ 133

[Grr]

2000 camaro N/A ls1
11.41@120

[ruthless351]

1993 mustang gt w/ 125 shot
12.2@114

[2wheeler]

The list has been changed to a top 20 list for cars, and a top 10 list for bikes. If you have updated times, post them up.

[Grr]

well thats pretty gay, that kid with the camaro, zac and myself are the only 2012 times on that list now. If it isnt current GTFO bunch of has been cars on there that dont even exist from members that havent been online for years. what a joke

[2wheeler]

Awww, thanks for your input Gary. I'll be sure to file it under 'No one gives a fuck'. Thanks.

[Grr]

good spot, right next to you

[63vette]

Do you really care about a list on a forum where a total of 10 people post in any given year? Lol....

[Grr]

not particularly, but its pretty retarded to take the time removing everyone off the bottom and leave 4 year old times on it. At least some of the people that were on it have participated in the last year or 2

[2wheeler]

Grr;327793 wrote:
good spot, right next to you

Zing! Good eye Gary!

[ashford]

83 mercury capri best for 2012
9.28@146

should get 8's next year

[Chirp5957]

wouldnt hurt to make another thread for a yearly top 10/20, then have an all time top 10.
problem with that is finding someone with enough patience and time to do it.

[legacy-user-351]

EDIT
Timing system malfunction, see below. :icon_shaking2:
EDIT

[zbrown]

Nice 60ft man

[legacy-user-351]

EDIT
Timing system malfunction, see below.
EDIT

[2wheeler]

I'm gonna need you to post up your quickest time in the right (spectator) lane for comparison. The timing lights in the left lane weren't working correctly during the time you made these runs.(the timers didnt start until the REAR wheels tripped the staging beams) We had to disallow many of the bike qualifying times due to this. We had many bikes that usually 60 foot in the mid/low 1.4s, have slips that showed mid 1.3s, and ETs that were 1.5 tenths quicker they had ever run.

[legacy-user-351]

2wheeler;328176 wrote:
I'm gonna need you to post up your quickest time in the right (spectator) lane for comparison. The timing lights in the left lane weren't working correctly during the time you made these runs.(the timers didnt start until the REAR wheels tripped the staging beams) We had to disallow many of the bike qualifying times due to this. We had many bikes that usually 60 foot in the mid/low 1.4s, have slips that showed mid 1.3s, and ETs that were 1.5 tenths quicker they had ever run.WTF.

Were the Top End guys aware of the issue? Nobody thought it would be cool to make an announcement that they were having problems? What was the time period they were malfunctioning? All day?

My best run in the spectator lane was a [email protected], which was my fastest trap, but I had a just average 60' of 1.859.

I also had two bad 330' splits.

60' times in the left lane:
1:03pm - 1.631
1:07pm - 1.883
4:02pm - 1.502
4:06pm - 1.584
4:11pm - 1.891
5:15pm - 1.824
5:19pm - 1.826

If you throw out the 3? bad ones I had better times last year.

Breaking down the video, it looks like you're right. Pretty hard to tell, but the 60' looks more like 1.8 and the ET 13+.

Shit.

[2wheeler]

No, it was not all day. It was corrected as soon as it was found.

The issue was found when some racers brought it to our attention that their time slips didn't seem correct. The time frame seems to be roughly between 3:30 and 4:15.

What would an announcement have done?

[legacy-user-351]

Ok, that's good to know, at least I know my 1.631 60' was real. If I hadn't missed the 2>3 shift that run it could've easily been my fastest... D'oh!

An annoucement would've let racers know to avoid that lane, but if it was corrected right after it was reported it wouldn't have made any difference.

Glad it was corrected quickly.