Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Fargo Scene
  3. Member's Rides
  4. Vanyo's Gold Civic Hatch #'s

Vanyo's Gold Civic Hatch #'s

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Member's Rides
28 Posts 14 Posters 2.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bubbaB Offline
    bubbaB Offline
    bubba
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    I think that was the only run i saw the gtr actually stage right and run... god the person driving it was fucking retarded...

    Current Cars:
    08 Honda Ruckus - Stunt Machine
    93 Subaru Impreza L - DD/ Winter beater
    90 Honda CRX - Project car
    90 Honda CRX Dx - Burnt (R.I.P.) - Racecar

    Past Cars: 85 Chevy C-10, 87 Dodge D-50, 91 Honda Prelude Si, 91 Buick Regal, 91 Acura Integra Ls, 87 Mazda RX-7, 90 Honda Civic Si, 91 Honda Civic Si, 89 Chevy S-10, 91 Honda Crx Hf, 91 Acura Integra Rs, 95 Subaru Impreza L, 92 Acura Integra GSR, 89 Mazda RX-7 (LT1), 88 Mazda RX-7, 92 Civic Cx, 87 Mazda RX-7 TII

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • zbrownZ Offline
      zbrownZ Offline
      zbrown
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      GoldyHatchPSI;312743 wrote:
      1.748 60'

      nice!

      rx7-8.89@157mph
      12v dodge, twins

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        aliengotpsi
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        inspector01;312704 wrote:
        It isn't a fact, it is an estimate, which is why it is stupid. Im just pointing out it is dumb to give dyno numbers from something you didn't run at, at least you put 350ish, some people will say it made XXX on a dyno they never ran on, sorry its just a pet peeve.

        Do you say I ran a XX.XX at sea level or in colder weather, but I haven't gotten the chance to run there yet. It is understandable to clarify that it is a low reading dyno, but giving out numbers is dumb IMO.

        So your telling me its not a fact that a car on MAP's Dyno Jet wont make more power than on a RS's, or DB's?
        Im pretty sure many ppl have proven my statement.. I made 522hp on DB's and in shootout mode it was @ 609. on the same boost level on a Dyno jet my car made 614 hp not 522.. Why would I want to say 522 when infact it made 614 @ 28psi

        Kevin Smith
        Straightlinedetailing.com
        Why does everybody brush their teeth before going to the dentist but never wash their car before bring it to me??

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SPANISH-RICES Offline
          SPANISH-RICES Offline
          SPANISH-RICE
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          aliengotpsi;312767 wrote:
          so your telling me its not a fact that a car on map's dyno jet wont make more power than on a rs's, or db's?
          Im pretty sure many ppl have proven my statement.. I made 522hp on db's and in shootout mode it was @ 609. On the same boost level on a dyno jet my car made 614 hp not 522.. Why would i want to say 522 when infact it made 614 @ 28psi

          becuase even that is a bogus number. Dynojets literally pull numbers out of their ass to get their readings. Its a tuning tool, its not an accurate measure of power. But of course everyone is going to go by their higher numbers.

          Unless he actually runs his car on a dynojet you have no facts as to what his numbers would be on one. Its just a guess. Of course its going to read higher, thats what dynojets are good for. Being a bigger number doesnt make it more accurate.

          here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
          legacy image
          PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2

          • 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • SPANISH-RICES Offline
            SPANISH-RICES Offline
            SPANISH-RICE
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            http://www.factorypro.com/magazine/Sports%20car%20International%20magazine/Making_hot_rodding_Honest,1-5wNOTES.pdf

            here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
            legacy image
            PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2

            • 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • inspector01I Offline
              inspector01I Offline
              inspector01
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              SPANISH-RICE;312768 wrote:
              becuase even that is a bogus number. Dynojets literally pull numbers out of their ass to get their readings. Its a tuning tool, its not an accurate measure of power. But of course everyone is going to go by their higher numbers.

              Unless he actually runs his car on a dynojet you have no facts as to what his numbers would be on one. Its just a guess. Of course its going to read higher, thats what dynojets are good for. Being a bigger number doesnt make it more accurate.

              Thank you, that is all that I was getting at.

              Yes it will read higher on a dynojet, but you don't know what it will unless you run it. I personally am a fan of saying what I actually made on whatever dyno I actually ran on, no shootout mode or other compensations, estimates. But I guess if higher numbers are what people need, go for it, dynos at the end of the day are a tuning tool.

              PVC Squad Member #1

              > bubba to Cobra Rob;279451 wrote:
              > ^ and I thought I posted some dumb shit...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                aliengotpsi
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Well im not a fan of a dynojet either as they have a hard time picking up rpm signal.

                 So what HP TQ should I say I have? DYNO JET, MUSTANG DYNO or DYNAMICS? Ive used them all...  the last dyno I was on read 667hp but I know it wouldnt have been that on DB's DD dyno.  I may just post what I get on my Virtual Dyno from my ecu..
                

                Kevin Smith
                Straightlinedetailing.com
                Why does everybody brush their teeth before going to the dentist but never wash their car before bring it to me??

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • inspector01I Offline
                  inspector01I Offline
                  inspector01
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  aliengotpsi;312776 wrote:
                  Well im not a fan of a dynojet either as they have a hard time picking up rpm signal.

                   So what HP TQ should I say I have? DYNO JET, MUSTANG DYNO or DYNAMICS? Ive used them all...  the last dyno I was on read 667hp but I know it wouldnt have been that on DB's DD dyno.  I may just post what I get on my Virtual Dyno from my ecu..
                  

                  I personally would just go with whatever dyno you ran on, no sense trying to compensate/estimate between them as it isn't accurate at all. Yes those numbers aren't comparable between machines, that is why it is only a tuning tool to see what improvements it made at the time of tuning, it sucks, but thats what happens when you switch machines.

                  PVC Squad Member #1

                  > bubba to Cobra Rob;279451 wrote:
                  > ^ and I thought I posted some dumb shit...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • zbrownZ Offline
                    zbrownZ Offline
                    zbrown
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    trap speed >> dyno number

                    rx7-8.89@157mph
                    12v dodge, twins

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • zbrownZ Offline
                      zbrownZ Offline
                      zbrown
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      SPANISH-RICE;312769 wrote:
                      http://www.factorypro.com/magazine/Sports%20car%20International%20magazine/Making_hot_rodding_Honest,1-5wNOTES.pdf

                      Interesting link!

                      rx7-8.89@157mph
                      12v dodge, twins

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • SPANISH-RICES Offline
                        SPANISH-RICES Offline
                        SPANISH-RICE
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #25

                        zbrown;312784 wrote:
                        trap speed >> dyno number

                        word

                        here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
                        legacy image
                        PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2

                        • 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          btleier
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #26

                          what turbo?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G Offline
                            G Offline
                            GoldyHatchPSI
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #27

                            Garret .57 trim

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B_radB Offline
                              B_radB Offline
                              B_rad
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #28

                              good numbers

                              92 civic4door: daily
                              91 civic: project
                              [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups