1988 Mustang With Engine Swap
-
I don't think that car would have hit 9s if he did have slicks on his car.
-
Hell I only lost maybe 3 seconds max when I snubbed my car out at the track.
-
i never said it would hit 9's but the reason it ran shitty was because of no traction.
R.I.P 1QK_PNY:icon_salut:
Current Ride-1983 Mustang GT T-top. 03 GSXR 750.
-
your telling me radial tires and a stock 5.0 i'm assuming? Put you into the 12's? show me the slip and i'll beleive you. As for the 88 i could care less if you think it's fast or or not. All i'm saying is 14's were not it's full potential i mean come on 462 CI in a notch i think would fair better than 14's thats just common sense.
R.I.P 1QK_PNY:icon_salut:
Current Ride-1983 Mustang GT T-top. 03 GSXR 750.
-
Turbo5Oh wrote:
i dont know about you but i had a stock suspension, radial tire mustang go into the mid 12's............. and with a stock motor, just admit it its slow!
This comes back to what you think is stock.Anything done performance-wise (i.e. headers) is considered not to be stock anymore.
-
if u would pay a little more attention i said stock motor, the car had bbk shorties edelbrock upper and lower intake 65mil t.b. and 65mil. mass air w/ 100 shot of squezze, the tire were a 245/50/16 nitto full belted dot approved radial
the car u speak of is junk, junk parts, junk motor, junk installation
that was the cars full potentional for what it was.......junk!
no dont get all high and mighty and pretend u know what ur talking about, uve been driving a car for what 1 year? -
Boy and here i thought you were a cool person ovbiously not. Your idea of stock is twisted and not what i was thinking of. And whether i've driven longer than one year is not what we're discussing. And as for the car...diss and rag on it all you want i dont care. I helped build it i know what its capable of and to think all of 14's is just uneducated a.k.a you.
R.I.P 1QK_PNY:icon_salut:
Current Ride-1983 Mustang GT T-top. 03 GSXR 750.
-
"uneducated"? ive been racing/repairing/beating the shit out of cars before uve dreamed about driving a car, ive had 1000's of hours in vehicle repair training and im also an ASE certified technition, service consultant, and parts consultant
not usualy a dick here but when the B.S. starts to get a little to thick i tend not to sit back and let it fly
let see ive recently pick up a plymouth acclaim let's say it runs a 19 sec 1/4 mile a 19 sec shouldnt be "it's full potential" if droped let's say a million bucks into it, it would run 9's, but i wont drop that into it so basically it will always be a 19 sec car, that is the cars full potentional!
the car has a worn out motor with a 7.5 inch rear end in it, if it had power and/or traction it would brake so basically it has no potentional to be faster than 14's
THE END
-
Owned.
-
Touchy arent we lol. FYI the engine was rebuilt so worn out is not quite the right word description. As for it breaking not likley though it may not have brand spankin new everything in it we made sure if it hooked nothing would snap. Now if your done throwing a fit i think we can both stop whoring this thread and let bygones be bygones.
R.I.P 1QK_PNY:icon_salut:
Current Ride-1983 Mustang GT T-top. 03 GSXR 750.
-
turbo 5oh's 5.0 had no where near the torque of the 455 hence the traction problem. All things considered it def did not run what it should of but who cares? Josh isnt selling the car based on 1/4 times so no need to discuss them any further.
R.I.P 1QK_PNY:icon_salut:
Current Ride-1983 Mustang GT T-top. 03 GSXR 750.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login