nsx engine?
-
AcesHigh wrote:
RSX-S > Prelude VTEC....Bullshit. Bring your RSX. Although the K20 is indeed technologically superior, H22A makes up in displacement. Yes there is understeer, but guess what. All FWD have some degree of understeer.
What about a prelude would make it faster??? Weight...no, thats not it. Power, no....thats not it either! Straight line or twisties, the prelude would get it's ass absolutely beat. Preludes are overpriced, overweight, 15 second cars with the worst transmission Honda ever put in a car next to the 3 speed STD tranny.
-
seanjohn wrote:
What about a prelude would make it faster??? Weight...no, thats not it. Power, no....thats not it either! Straight line or twisties, the prelude would get it's ass absolutely beat. Preludes are overpriced, overweight, 15 second cars with the worst transmission Honda ever put in a car next to the 3 speed STD tranny.right on the worst trannys ever but not on 15sec car i have heard of guys running mid 14s on just a h22 and some minor mods
ps.. if u have a RSX lets race
-
spoolude wrote:
right on the worst trannys ever but not on 15sec car i have heard of guys running mid 14s on just a h22 and some minor modsps.. if u have a RSX lets race
I hear a lot of shit, but until I see it I won't believe it. Obviously you have a prelude, and I'm definitely not knocking it...its not a bad car, but the point is that stock for stock an rsx is better in pretty much every category than the prelude. Now if they only made them in 4ws ( :rolleyes: ) !
-
wut kind of numbers dose a non vtec rsx make?
-
spoolude wrote:
wut kind of numbers dose a non vtec rsx make?Innovation propels the RSX in a few ways, starting with its engine. Its "intelligent" Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control (i-VTEC
) is even more impressive than its first incarnation, the powerful VTEC engine.In the RSX, i-VTEC helps the responsive 2.0-liter, DOHC engine put out 160-horsepower, while in the RSX Type-S, the engine is pushed to a robust 210-horsepower. Remarkably powerful? Yes. And uncommonly fuel efficient, affording both engines with Low-Emission-Vehicle (LEV-2) ratings and an 110,000-mile service sticker
NOt track numbers but it should help
http://www.acura.com/models/model_perf_engine.asp?module=rsx RSX
Type-S
Engine Type
Aluminum Alloy 16-Valve, DOHC, i-VTECTM Inline 4-cylinder
Displacement (liters)
2.0
Horsepower (SAE net)
160 bhp @ 6500 rpm
210 bhp @ 7800 rpm
Torque
141 lbs-ft @ 4000 rpm
143 lbs-ft @ 7000 rpm
Redline
6800 rpm
8100 rpm
Compression Ratio
9.8:1
11.0:1
Fuel Injection
PGM-FI Multi-Point Injection
Emissions
LEV-II CARB -
ya dude my dad has an rsx im itching to see how fast it is. Apparently my complete exhaust kit non turbo with a test pipe gets beaten off the line but then it keeps up with the rsx for acceleration. though undoubtly the rsx has more potential than the gsr. yeah id be up to race though its a really touchy clutch for starts, ill most likely burn the wheels first few times.
kenn
-
theoblivious wrote:
ya dude my dad has an rsx im itching to see how fast it is. Apparently my complete exhaust kit non turbo with a test pipe gets beaten off the line but then it keeps up with the rsx for acceleration. though undoubtly the rsx has more potential than the gsr. yeah id be up to race though its a really touchy clutch for starts, ill most likely burn the wheels first few times.kenn
I think "more potential" depends on the amount of money you have to burn..id rather drive a boosted gsr then a stock rsx.
-
its a type s
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login