Economy

[MisterCMK]

pwn.t

[krzydrftr93]

I got 42 mpg going 85 from fargo to rapid city

46mpg from fargo to jamestown. The hills after that knocked it down:D

[KA-T_240]

94NDTA wrote:
346.

ok ok.:D

every body advertises stuff bigger.

[MisterCMK]

krzydrftr93 wrote:
I got 42 mpg going 85 from fargo to rapid city

46mpg from fargo to jamestown. The hills after that knocked it down:D

Its still just an uncomfortable econobox

[Guest]

MisterCMK wrote:

I get 20 in the exploder on the interstate but its comfy as hell and I can fit 5 people.

Hell, the mustang even would pull 25 doin 75mph on the way home and 27 if I did the speed limit

Still wanna trade. i see you have found the stang. now lets trade.

[Guest]

I was getting 30mpg last time I checked (on the way to SCN). Now that I've made the switch to E85 and a reflashed ecu(and still using utec), we'll see how things are.

BTW, my car has never felt/launched better than since I put E85 in

[24valvenotak]

MisterCMK wrote:
Its still just an uncomfortable econobox

a mustang interior is a pile of shit.

the v6's are econoboxes.. at least thats what i would tell people because they sure as hell arnt a muscle car.

[krzydrftr93]

MisterCMK wrote:
Its still just an uncomfortable econobox

And some muscle car like an late 80s camaro or something is any different.

I didnt have a problem with comfort and i was in the seat for 8 hours. I just know for a fact that my buddies 88 camaro was just as uncomfortable as a civic(old)

[MisterCMK]

AnGeL. wrote:
Still wanna trade. i see you have found the stang. now lets trade.

Key word there is "would." I did not say "does."

[Guest]

MisterCMK wrote:
the mustang

usually when people say "the mustang" or "the civic" or "the gsx" or somethign like that, they are referring to their car.

Thanks. You lose

[MisterCMK]

AnGeL. wrote:
usually when people say "the mustang" or "the civic" or "the gsx" or somethign like that, they are referring to their car.

Thanks. You lose

That doesn't mean that they still have the vehicle, hence the use of the word "would."

kthxbye

[PSiedTSi]

AnGeL. wrote:
usually when people say "the mustang" or "the civic" or "the gsx" or somethign like that, they are referring to their car.

Thanks. You lose

I'm sorry that quote is incomplete. He's got you by the balls.

[Guest]

When some1 would refer to a car they previously had... wouldnt they something like "my old car" or "my past car"?

[MisterCMK]

PSiedTSi wrote:
I'm sorry that quote is incomplete. He's got you by the balls.

:icon_cheers:

[Guest]

wannabe wrote:

...Discuss

[/end e-Ass kicking]

I say fart can.

It's fwd nothings going to be better on gas then fwd.

[StangerBanger96]

F150 MPG > Honda MPG
More links....I like this quote

Ford is developing a new "Hydraulic Hybrid" system that is 300 percent more efficient than the system used in the Toyota's Prius

http://www.chryslerforum.com/m_4021/tm.htm

http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1585002&page=3

[MisterCMK]

honda civic torque < f-150 lugnut torque

[adog]

tjamz wrote:
I was getting 30mpg last time I checked (on the way to SCN). Now that I've made the switch to E85 and a reflashed ecu(and still using utec), we'll see how things are.

BTW, my car has never felt/launched better than since I put E85 in

Did you have to replace much of the fuel system for that? I've been pondering switching myself, if I can find large enough injectors.

[91nbtsi]

MisterCMK wrote:
honda civic torque < f-150 lugnut torque

LOL:icon_thumleft:

[Guest]

adog wrote:
Did you have to replace much of the fuel system for that? I've been pondering switching myself, if I can find large enough injectors.

I didn't change anything in the fuel system. Theres a debate over whether you need to get rid of all the rubber pieces in the fuel system or not since ethanol can break down the rubber and cause it to flake off, but in reading about other subie owners that are running E85 w/ no changes for a couple of years with no problems, I'd say that I'm willing to try w/o making any changes for a while.