For the import haters
-
SPANISH-RICE;282292 wrote:
lol , nice trynice classic comebacks to the "ricer excuses". "who cares about bankruptcy? whats that have to do with racing?"
lol the fact that you've built shitty sub par products for so many years that not even your own countries citizens will buy your shit ass cars.
foreign companies are out innovating and doing things to improve the market. meanwhile domestic companies are closing plants, laying people off, and enjoying the government taking over their business. hhmmmm not only is that obviously the better product its definitely the superior business. ?
still gotta love the "no replacement for displacement" slogan all you fan bois have, how bout "power to weight" or "power per liter". any one can bore big holes. do something with your life
U gunna be ok?
-
Lol i had a little buzz goin and had a few things to say. I just think it's funny when these domestic guys truly think that they make a better product apple to apple. It might make more power.. But like i said anyone can bore big holes. I bet if honda made a 350ci+ motor too they would, a. Kick emission's ass b. Get killer mileage c. Make more power d. Weigh less.
Theres a reason why almost all indy car motors are hondas, not some domestic crap
here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2- 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
-
SPANISH-RICE;282363 wrote:
Lol i had a little buzz goin and had a few things to say. I just think it's funny when these domestic guys truly think that they make a better product apple to apple. It might make more power.. But like i said anyone can bore big holes. I bet if honda made a 350ci+ motor too they would, a. Kick emission's ass b. Get killer mileage c. Make more power d. Weigh less.Theres a reason why almost all indy car motors are hondas, not some domestic crap
Mabye because indy cars are gay?
-
Bp-08;282365 wrote:
Mabye because indy cars are gay?I like indy cars.
-
zbrown;282366 wrote:
so the honda K and B series own the ecotec??yep. only place the eco's really shine is you can bolt a grand prix trans up with an adapter plate.
-
LOL! Yea video is over the top and very biased but was worth a laugh.
-
SPANISH-RICE;282363 wrote:
Lol i had a little buzz goin and had a few things to say. I just think it's funny when these domestic guys truly think that they make a better product apple to apple. It might make more power.. But like i said anyone can bore big holes. I bet if honda made a 350ci+ motor too they would, a. Kick emission's ass b. Get killer mileage c. Make more power d. Weigh less.Theres a reason why almost all indy car motors are hondas, not some domestic crap
Bolded comment above could be a new ricer quote. :icon_monkey:
-
SPANISH-RICE;282363 wrote:
Lol i had a little buzz goin and had a few things to say. I just think it's funny when these domestic guys truly think that they make a better product apple to apple. It might make more power.. But like i said anyone can bore big holes. I bet if honda made a 350ci+ motor too they would, a. Kick emission's ass b. Get killer mileage c. Make more power d. Weigh less.Theres a reason why almost all indy car motors are hondas, not some domestic crap
And ever heard of the chevy ls motors?
-
00ws6transam;282371 wrote:
bolded comment above could be a new ricer quote. :icon_monkey:prove me wrong then. The honda ridgeline with 3.5l v6 can can tow almost 1000lbs more than the durango with a v8 and can gets close to 10mpg better. And those are real stats. I work in a dealership where i can compare hondas to domestics everyday and you wont come up with anything , trust me.
bp-08;282383 wrote:
and ever heard of the chevy ls motors?and?
bp-08;282365 wrote:
mabye because indy cars are gay?
you must have been on the debate team as a kid huh? This is one of the best arguments i've ever heard. Youre obviously an expert on the subjecthere a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2- 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
-
can some one pull up the link where it showed hp vs torque. with the same car/trans/weight/ect....
guess what won. hp..... no shit huh....
-
SPANISH-RICE;282404 wrote:
prove me wrong then. The honda ridgeline with 3.5l v6 can can tow almost 1000lbs more than the durango with a v8 and can gets close to 10mpg better. And those are real stats. I work in a dealership where i can compare hondas to domestics everyday and you wont come up with anything , trust me.and?
you must have been on the debate team as a kid huh? This is one of the best arguments i've ever heard. Youre obviously an expert on the subject
Prove you wrong? I could care less about a ridgeline and gas mileage. I was laughing at your ricer comment about apples to apples and that honda could make a bigger CI motor and make more power etc... Apples to apples would be car to car not displacement to displacement.
I care about whats quicker, so if someone wants to start with a car that has an engine 30% the size of mine go for it.
Hondas typically make lighter cars, with better gas mileage and usually a better hp/liter ratio, yes. So if you want any of those buy one. I choose speed and overall performance.
-
in the most round about way your saying a honda is slow and has no performance......
read what you just said.
-
QUOTE=63vette;282296]Like Toyotas biodegradable truck line.. lol.[/QUOTE]
you really didn't just say toyota's suck......:icon_scratch:
um go google top gear kill a toyorta truck.
also the 22r series of motors are stupid reliable.
-
Phats;282410 wrote:
wow. so, i have a feeling he put this up here PURELY to get a reaction like this lolwithout a doubt
-
DrifterExtreme;282408 wrote:
in the most round about way your saying a honda is slow and has no performance......read what you just said.
Well I was agreeing with part of what Spanish said, and that I choose my car on things other than those. Such as speed, power, quickness etc...
Slow is relative, also honda includes a wide variety of vehicles. But for the most part, a car such as mine (stock) is faster than most (stock) hondas.
I never said hondas have no performance.
What i am saying overall is thats a ricer comment (spanishes) and why bother whining about dicplacement to use as a performance crutch.
-
63vette;282296 wrote:
Like Toyotas biodegradable truck line.. lol.Again I've owned a gas 2002 Ford F150, gas 2007 Chevy Silverado, 2007 Duramax and now a 2008 Tundra, i'll take my new tundra over anyone of those.. I am more than happy with this one and it's lasted longer in the 7 months I've had it then the other ones did.
2003 Mitsubishi Evolution 8
2011 Ford F150 Ecoboost
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login