For the import haters
-
this argument has turned to shit, thanks zac, parker, and gary....
you guys really need to get a clue, it was never about who was faster or w/e
as ANYONE knows that rwd is better for drag racing. just like mid engine is better for handling(weight distribution and all).
So why pound the fact into the ground. we get it, and i have never said fwd>rwd.
and ws6transam..... what does having a 11 sec car and having one that is capable of running 11's different? thats the same thing as saying i have a zr1 corvette it ran xx.x in the 1/4 mile.( by a pro). does that mean i don't have a car that runs xx.x in the 1/4?
you smoking something buddy?
also how does mpg NOT come into effect with a car. why would i build a car that get 8mpg with the same "potential" as a car that can get 25-35 mpg?
ask gary as he is braggin up his mpg, he must be stupid....
think about it a honda can go run 10's and still drive around getting 35+ mpg. that is impressive no matter how you look at it.
can a v8 do it, maybe but most likely not. i can't even beleave you guys are arguing mpg. i mean there is no argument from the v8 side. admit 4cyl is better for mileage. just like a big ass v8 can make big ass hp.
/argument
-
DrifterExtreme;282721 wrote:
as ANYONE knows that rwd is better for drag racing. just like mid engine is better for handling(weight distribution and all).lol so what would FWD be better at?? grocery getting in the snow?...... I mean since you say RWD is only better for drag racing
-
zbrown;282730 wrote:
lol so what would FWD be better at?? grocery getting in the snow?...... I mean since you say RWD is only better for drag racingreally where did i say ONLY? i said it was better at drag racing. don't twist what i said.
also where did i say fwd was better? it can be effectively used well. i think we can agree on that.
-
MisterCMK;282747 wrote:
Go be poor somewhere else if you can't afford to put gas in your car. Who the fuck cares about gas mileage?oh yeah i forgot i'm poor because i don't like to waste money.....
cmk hits a new low?
-
DrifterExtreme;282783 wrote:
oh yeah i forgot i'm poor because i don't like to waste money.....cmk hits a new low?
Wasting money is buying something of low quality and then having to buy it again in a week when it is broken. Enjoying a vehicle is hardly considered wasting money.
-
63vette;282786 wrote:
Its like watching 2 monkeys fucking a football.....Pics or video or it didn't happen.
Sterling Archer: Oh my god! You killed a hooker!
Cyril Figgis: Call girl!
Sterling Archer: No Cyril! When they're dead they're just hookers!
-
63vette;282786 wrote:
Its like watching 2 monkeys fucking a football.....dementia setting in early for ya old man?
-
nice Days of Thunder quote there 63vette...I LOL'ed
-
Lol at everything. My pos tracer gets the same gas mileage as your precious hondas. And I just replaced my original thermostat this week. The only thing that has ever gone wrong with that thing is the tranny went out at 180,000 miles due to my fault. And 2 timing belts but thats expected. Now that thing has 210,000 miles and ill line it up stock for stock with any honda with over 200k. Yea Im going to turbo it eventually for shits and giggles. But ill admit that rwd anything is better than any fwd. Im just doing this because its cheaper for me and I can actually do my own shit.
And if you wanna go hp/liter well the mazda gtr which uses the same exact motor as my tracer can pump out over 325whp on stock turbo. So lets see at 1.8 liters id say thats well over 100hp/liter. Show me a honda using all oem parts ruinning 12s.
I didnt get my pos fwd because I thought it would be fast.
And seriously quit taking about gas mileage, if your worried about gas mileage your in the wrong game. Go hug some trees or something.
-
bubba;282832 wrote:
.And at 200k... most hondas are just getting broke in...
lol.... mmmk
remember this isn't a cummins
yes they are reliable and long runners, but to say that an engine like that is at 100% at 200k is ridiculous......show me a leakdown of under 7% on a 200k honda motor..... it will be few and bar between
-
this thread is so dumb.
-
Bp-08;282818 wrote:
Lol at everything. My pos tracer gets the same gas mileage as your precious hondas. And I just replaced my original thermostat this week. The only thing that has ever gone wrong with that thing is the tranny went out at 180,000 miles due to my fault. And 2 timing belts but thats expected. Now that thing has 210,000 miles and ill line it up stock for stock with any honda with over 200k. Yea Im going to turbo it eventually for shits and giggles. But ill admit that rwd anything is better than any fwd. Im just doing this because its cheaper for me and I can actually do my own shit.And if you wanna go hp/liter well the mazda gtr which uses the same exact motor as my tracer can pump out over 325whp on stock turbo. So lets see at 1.8 liters id say thats well over 100hp/liter. Show me a honda using all oem parts ruinning 12s.
I didnt get my pos fwd because I thought it would be fast.
And seriously quit taking about gas mileage, if your worried about gas mileage your in the wrong game. Go hug some trees or something.
my god your stupid.
anyone think of nicks little pos civic that ran 11.9 with a stock d series on a damn safc. yeah that thing ran stock motors.
dude there are 500+hp stock k series motors out there, just shut up.
this thread has went to shit.
-
nah...this thread started out as shit (talking) and got dumber as it went along (somehow)
-
DrifterExtreme;282721 wrote:
this argument has turned to shit, thanks zac, parker, and gary....you guys really need to get a clue, it was never about who was faster or w/e
as ANYONE knows that rwd is better for drag racing. just like mid engine is better for handling(weight distribution and all).
So why pound the fact into the ground. we get it, and i have never said fwd>rwd.
and ws6transam..... what does having a 11 sec car and having one that is capable of running 11's different? thats the same thing as saying i have a zr1 corvette it ran xx.x in the 1/4 mile.( by a pro). does that mean i don't have a car that runs xx.x in the 1/4?
you smoking something buddy?
also how does mpg NOT come into effect with a car. why would i build a car that get 8mpg with the same "potential" as a car that can get 25-35 mpg?
ask gary as he is braggin up his mpg, he must be stupid....
think about it a honda can go run 10's and still drive around getting 35+ mpg. that is impressive no matter how you look at it.
can a v8 do it, maybe but most likely not. i can't even beleave you guys are arguing mpg. i mean there is no argument from the v8 side. admit 4cyl is better for mileage. just like a big ass v8 can make big ass hp.
/argument
There is a big difference between having a 11 second car( that actually runs 11's at a track) or having enough power to theoretically runs 11's. Real world numbers vary from ideals and theoretical numbers. If you cant put the power to the ground what good is it?
You are going to extremes on the mpg (8 is ridiculous). MPG is not a concern when I am building a street strip car.
Why would I build a car that gets half the mileage of a car that has the same "potential". Easy
-Longevity of build (Motor and drivetrain to last longer)
-Traction (rwd vs fwd)I have never argued gas mileage. 4cyl gas mileage FTW!
oh and yes, I fully agree it is very impressive for a honda to run 10's period, without even getting 35+mpg. Its fun to see cars like that.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login