Well we finally went to the track with the blue car.
-
DaveH;287026 wrote:
Sweet! Congrats guys. What was the 60' time?2.096 60ft for Dans best pass.
And I cut a 2.3 60ft taking it easy on it. (it's better when the owner of the car breaks it)
This was all on the 18" street tires.
-
Just wait until next year should be even more fun with a bigger turbo, and a custom intake manifold.
-
thats an easy 11 car as is.. 2.0 60 foot is really bad.. id say its close to a 11.5-11.6 car with a 1.7 60 foot.
does it make 550 hp on a DD dyno converted to Dynojet numbers? if not thats close to 640 hp.. on a Dynojet.. How much boost are you running.? What fuel? What turbos
?IF you want we can do a roll on against my EVO which has ran a shitty best of 11.3@ 126 1.7 60 foots made 535hp 470 TQ on 30 psi w/ E85
-
aliengotpsi;287782 wrote:
thats an easy 11 car as is.. 2.0 60 foot is really bad.. id say its close to a 11.5-11.6 car with a 1.7 60 foot.does it make 550 hp on a DD dyno converted to Dynojet numbers? if not thats close to 640 hp.. on a Dynojet.. How much boost are you running.? What fuel? What turbos
?IF you want we can do a roll on against my EVO which has ran a shitty best of 11.3@ 126 1.7 60 foots made 535hp 470 TQ on 30 psi w/ E85
GT3582R turbo A1000 fuel pump with a sumped tank, -8 feed line -6 return, 1200cc injectors, E85. Tuned on Shanes dyno at DB. So it was on a dynodynamics at 22psi.
We are fairly confident we could have easily made 600+ with a few more pounds of boost.
The plan for this winter is bigger exhaust and a custom turbo, coupled with a custom intake manifold which I will build.
We will likely get booted from the track next year on drag radials.
-
aliengotpsi;287782 wrote:
thats an easy 11 car as is.. 2.0 60 foot is really bad.. id say its close to a 11.5-11.6 car with a 1.7 60 foot.does it make 550 hp on a DD dyno converted to Dynojet numbers? if not thats close to 640 hp.. on a Dynojet.. How much boost are you running.? What fuel? What turbos
?IF you want we can do a roll on against my EVO which has ran a shitty best of 11.3@ 126 1.7 60 foots made 535hp 470 TQ on 30 psi w/ E85
It looks like a Supra, not a 3000GT Alien...
-
Interesting discovery. Hooked up my laptop finally and did some pulls with the same settings we had at the track and the most boost our EBC would give us was 19psi with one spike at 20psi.
So this car definitely has more in it. And I started playing with the two step just a bit kinda neat having 16psi in neutral.
-
Nate I saw that after i posted that but didnt care to edit..
Is this the guy who was at the MAP event in BIR? If so I remember Tufte ripping in to you... might be a different guy.. O and more than likely DB converts to Dyno Jet numbers..
-
aliengotpsi;287855 wrote:
Nate I saw that after i posted that but didnt care to edit..Is this the guy who was at the MAP event in BIR? If so I remember Tufte ripping in to you... might be a different guy.. O and more than likely DB converts to Dyno Jet numbers..
Yup that was me. And to this day I will stand by my point, that at work we do build our own turbos. And just because we use garretts wheels does not take that away. That is like saying Tufte doesn't make his own manifolds because he doesn't have a mandrel bender and roll his own stainless tubing.
-
I was to drunk to remember what u were bitchn about..
-
funky_monkey58;287858 wrote:
Yup that was me. And to this day I will stand by my point, that at work we do build our own turbos. And just because we use garretts wheels does not take that away. That is like saying Tufte doesn't make his own manifolds because he doesn't have a mandrel bender and roll his own stainless tubing.Oh shit, that was you.....haha, yea, you made your self look like an idiot.........never connected that you were him. You said a lot more than that you just used garret wheels....
-
inspector01;287887 wrote:
Oh shit, that was you.....haha, yea, you made your self look like an idiot.........never connected that you were him. You said a lot more than that you just used garret wheels....
http://www.suprasport.com/gallery.asp?catalogid=756
They look pretty good for a bs turbo huh? -
aliengotpsi;287782 wrote:
thats an easy 11 car as is.. 2.0 60 foot is really bad.. id say its close to a 11.5-11.6 car with a 1.7 60 foot.does it make 550 hp on a DD dyno converted to Dynojet numbers? if not thats close to 640 hp.. on a Dynojet.. How much boost are you running.? What fuel? What turbos
?IF you want we can do a roll on against my EVO which has ran a shitty best of 11.3@ 126 1.7 60 foots made 535hp 470 TQ on 30 psi w/ E85
what a quick ride good job man:icon_salut:
-
funky_monkey58;287892 wrote:
http://www.suprasport.com/gallery.asp?catalogid=756
They look pretty good for a bs turbo huh?So do ebay turbos......
You were saying a lot more shit than that, like that you should select the engine around what turbo you wanted to run, that you could get turbos from china and change the housings to sell for a lot more, and some other things. Now maybe you were just really drunk, but you sounded pretty stupid.
Do you make your own center sections and just use garret wheels?? Or do you just make housings??
-
I was pretty drunk, I would never support selling anything china brand, as a house product.
The castings are designed in house, and machined in house. We use Comp Turbo center sections, and work closely with Comp on new turbos.
I must have been trying to make a point on efficiency of a turbo and if you have a turbo you are set on, it would be idle on certain engines and not all.
I really don't know though I was pretty gone by then.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login