New Ford power numbers
-
I'd rather have the cummins sry
-
the cummins is bad ass but everything about the interior of a dodge just plain sucks
-
zbrown;300918 wrote:
whoa.... what??Mr anti Jap. prefers a Jap. motor?? hmmmm...
I actually saw a Duramax in Wisconsin that had a "My truck was built with wrenches, not chop sticks" sticker in the back window this summer, it made me LOL.....
-
24valvenotak;300958 wrote:
the cummins is bad ass but everything about the interior of a dodge just plain sucksif i could have anything it would be a 05-06ish ford 3/4ton....... but with a 12v/auto combo
Ford makes a good truck, things are just iffy in the engine department when you consider what engine you could have
inspector01;300968 wrote:
I actually saw a Duramax in Wisconsin that had a "My truck was built with wrenches, not chop sticks" sticker in the back window this summer, it made me LOL.....lol... poor ignorant guy
MisterCMK;300932 wrote:
Zac, is the 2011 Cummins gonna step up or is Dodge going to stick with the paltry 6.7 they have now?doesn't matter if they do or not...
something must be "alright" about the cummins if the 5.9 is offered in the f650/f750.........strange they never offered a powerstroke
you think ford will step up and rate this motor at higher than a 150k major service interval like the past couple were?? LOL
oh.... and i don't like the idea of having to pull my cab to do ..... well anything
-
I think the old 7.3 that I have in my towing mule is a decent engine. Ford shoulda kept the old girl and just updated the injection/turbo on it instead of making the 6.0 and 6.4.
zbrown;300972 wrote:
if i could have anything it would be a 05-06ish ford 3/4ton....... but with a 12v/auto comboFord makes a good truck, things are just iffy in the engine department when you consider what engine you could have
lol... poor ignorant guy
doesn't matter if they do or not...
something must be "alright" about the cummins if the 5.9 is offered in the f650/f750.........strange they never offered a powerstroke
you think ford will step up and rate this motor at higher than a 150k major service interval like the past couple were?? LOL
oh.... and i don't like the idea of having to pull my cab to do ..... well anything
DaveH
'94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph -
24valvenotak;300958 wrote:
the cummins is bad ass but everything about the interior of a dodge just plain sucksMitch, the new Dodges are pretty nice (finally). My 2007 has some items in the interior that aren't great, but overall I like it.
Impressive numbers on the new Ford powerplant, that's for sure. Time will tell if it is a good thing for Ford to have total control of the engine design. I will stick with my simple inline 6 for now:)
-
Only think i will never understand, is why is the suramax and powerstroke so god damned complicated. A very simple inline 6 kickes there ass, yet they continue to "reinvent the wheel".
It's just stupid.
-
91nbtsi;301008 wrote:
Mitch, the new Dodges are pretty nice (finally). My 2007 has some items in the interior that aren't great, but overall I like it.Impressive numbers on the new Ford powerplant, that's for sure. Time will tell if it is a good thing for Ford to have total control of the engine design. I will stick with my simple inline 6 for now:)
i drove an 09 mega cab big horn or whatever crazy name they have for it now and i didnt really like it. i am not saying it fell apart when i touched it, it just wasnt for me.
-
The 7.3 couldn't meet emission standards and had to go. Ford as well as Chevy didn't do any "reinvention of the wheel" with the 6.0 and 6.6 respectively. Both were developed by outside suppliers, to meet the manufacturers specs. I'm sure there are proprietary patents on some key I 6 components, held by Cummins, CAT, Detroit, etc. that prohibit Ford or Chevy from manufacturing a competitive, both in price and performance, engine with international and Isuzu.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
capitlj;301023 wrote:
The 7.3 couldn't meet emission standards and had to go. Ford as well as Chevy didn't do any "reinvention of the wheel" with the 6.0 and 6.6 respectively. Both were developed by outside suppliers, to meet the manufacturers specs. I'm sure there are proprietary patents on some key I 6 components, held by Cummins, CAT, Detroit, etc. that prohibit Ford or Chevy from manufacturing a competitive, both in price and performance, engine with international and Isuzu.Well thats actually a pretty good point that i didn't think of. They may not be able to produce or were not able in the begining they could produce a I6.
I guess my whole point was that if the big inline diesel's work so well in the industrial trucks/equipment. Why make a v8 over a scaled down inline?
-
I'm sure streamlining the assembly process has a little to do with it too. The gas and diesel trucks roll of the same sarmbly line and its probably easier to bolt in a V8 diesel and gas motor on the same assembly line.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
I'm hardly that narrow minded Chris. I'm just offering up feasible reasons, apart from the obvious V8>all.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login