Apt building fire in S. Fargo
-
-
I made the mistake of trying to drive down 40th ave and it's complete chaos down here.
Looks like the top floor of the building is pretty well toast.
Per the radio it sounds like 2 firefighters doing Search and Rescue had a close call and ended up trapped briefly themselves. -
The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire. We don't need no water let the mother fucker buuuuuuuuuuuuurn.
-Eric
-
i just drove by there a lil bit ago, and they are still using 2 aerial trucks.
here are some pics from the forum:
http://www.inforum.com/event/photogallery/id/1815/ -
Got a few pics last night. My wife's coworker met her at Hornbachers, He said he went for a walk, and when he got home the place was burning so he just walked to Hornbachers to think. He lived on the 3rd floor, He lost everything he had.
-
both of my brother-in-laws used to live in that building. FWIW, that building had bar none the WORST fire detection system I've seen from a modern apt building. And their sprinkler system appeared to lack proper coverage as well.
-
HandoEX;316305 wrote:
If you rent, get renter's insurance! It's cheap.QFT! I pay 80 bucks a year. Sad part is id bet 70 percent or better of these people didn't have any.
-
Grr;316311 wrote:
then the joke is on them isnt it? LULZ on losers without insuranceyour cool
-
Grr;316311 wrote:
then the joke is on them isnt it? LULZ on losers without insuranceThat is pretty low gary. i mean just don't say anything even if everyone knows it's foolish to not have insurance.
-
My question is...Would the person responsible for starting the fire be responsible for all the damages to the building and all the other tenant's belongings? Or does something like this not work that way and everyone is responsible for their own stuff, even though they were not the ones responsible for the fire? I'm not really positive how it would work in this situation, but that is usually how other insurance works.
-
awd95mn;316323 wrote:
My question is...Would the person responsible for starting the fire be responsible for all the damages to the building and all the other tenant's belongings? Or does something like this not work that way and everyone is responsible for their own stuff, even though they were not the ones responsible for the fire? I'm not really positive how it would work in this situation, but that is usually how other insurance works.The person may be held legally liable, which opens them up to a lawsuit or lawsuits, But.....for the most part, the building owners have their own insurance for cases like this which will cover the building only. Renters with insurance will likely be covered by their policy, renter without...... well? sucks but they will be out of everything they lost. If the person that started the fire has insurance i suppose it is possible that the other insurance company's may sue the responsible s insurance. but.... still, without opening a civil suit against the responsible party, the uninsured are out of luck.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login