Is GOD real?

[DaveH]

2wheeler;199983 wrote:
Ok, and who's butthurt now?

My butt is fine. lol

2wheeler;199983 wrote:
Not an expert at all. All I can take into consideration is the time I've spent with all 3 of you. From those times, conversations, and experiences, there is no comparison.

Seems like a personal cheap shot there, no? I didn't ask what you thought of Matt or myself compared to your co-worker.

You said that this guy does what the bible says and "walks the walk". I asked how do you know this? You don't seem to have a grasp on basic biblical ideas like sin, etc. So how do you know if he's following what the bible says? Thats all I'm asking.

[2wheeler]

Well put ichibankilla.

[2wheeler]

DaveH;200009 wrote:
You said that this guy does what the bible says and "walks the walk". I asked how do you know this? You don't seem to have a grasp on basic biblical ideas like sin, etc. So how do you know if he's following what the bible says? Thats all I'm asking.

Because I have FAITH in my opinion. I BELIEVE what I've said is correct. lolz. I'm a Christian now. ROFL

Like I said, this is way to much to post back and forth about. It would have to be a face to face conversation to get my point across.

[2wheeler]

Dave, as far as a personal cheap shot.....that was never intended. What you quoted was exactly what I have to work with......my time spent with you, Matt and Doug. I have nothing else to compare with. If all three of you are christians, great. From what you and Matt have said, there are no different levels of christianity. Fine. Then all three of you are the same, no better, no worse. From someone who is not christian, outside looking in, its is easy for me to create levels of "how christian someone is" according to what I see and what I want to believe. That's my opinion and I am more than justified to have it.

[DaveH]

Originally Posted by fallguy
Ethan, I am really sorry that I don't meet your expectation of what a true Christian should be. I'll work on that.

2wheeler;200006 wrote:
Your response pretty much sums up why I would not want to be a part of an organization that would treat person A like that.

I think I get it now, there is no humor allowed when discussing religious things! I guess I wasn't aware of that. Or maybe you missed the smilie?

Seriously.

[Parker]

this might get a bit off topic

at the ripe old age of 22, i can say i have not experienced that life changing moment.... like the one that make me really believe. i do however believe that there is a god, and an afterlife. i do however also believe in evolution, more so than god. i just cant get it past me the proof of evolution...maybe it all fits in somewere, will we ever find out in our lifetime?.. no,will our childrens children ever find out why we are here?... perhaps not....
have you ever gazed up at the sky and just thought about what you see? billions of stars, some suns like ours that may possibly have planets just like ours....its just stupid to think that theres not life somewere else.... perhaps its not huminoid like us, but just life itself.... it just make you really think about who we are, and what part do we have here just on this planet... it just really makes you think when you cant even begin to imagine whats out there and how big it might be.... and how it was formed... what/who formed it...

but you can just completely disregard that last part if you think the earth is flat... sorry if i got off topic, its 4am, im tired and just came in from starring at the stars outside :rolleyes:

[out there]

matt, i think we're possibly on the same page regarding the acceptance of the christ, but i'm not yet sure...
my perspective has always been that one achieves salvation through acceptance (which implies belief) and actions. simply lip-servicing the gospel and scripture may be good enough for the masses, but the real way into heaven (keep in mind, i'm undecided as to whether a heaven exists, but that's another matter) is through the way one lives their life. the atheist that lives a life valuing other people as people, not things, trying their best to get along without stepping on toes and offering what they can to help otheres is just as valuable as the devout believer who lived a similar life.
so what if person A went to church "religiously" (pun intended ) and person B steadfastly refused? in the end, each treated their fellow man with decency and respect, doing what they could to help others in need. when i use the approach of "what would jesus do", i mean that literally, what would he do in this situation? the real world emulation and practice of christ's teachings. computer science doesn't guarantee an understanding of hardware trouble-shooting; michael schenker doesn't need to understand how the electronics of his guitars, amps and effects work; michael schumacher doesn't necessarily need to know how to change oil; etc.
the real test isn't in whether or not one believes, it's the actions that define their lives.
words and belief are dead without action. i don't remember where, but i know that is a paraphrase of some part of the new testament. i'm no expert on what is in the new testament, though i have done some exploring.

[99civic]

i believe in god but when you hear other people's point of views that sound more logical (dont know if thats the right word im looking for) it kinda makes you think. as you were raised with what ever religion you are, they told you there beliefs and you followed them and were raised to believe it. but when you get older and learn more about science and what not its kinda hard to believe one can make all of this. i also believe there are living organisms outside earth.

[DaveH]

2wheeler;200011 wrote:
Because I have FAITH in my opinion. I BELIEVE what I've said is correct. lolz. I'm a Christian now. ROFL.

Your response pretty much sums up why I would not want to be a part of an organization that would treat a person like that.

[fallguy]

99civic;200031 wrote:
i believe in god but when you hear other people's point of views that sound more logical (dont know if thats the right word im looking for) it kinda makes you think. as you were raised with what ever religion you are, they told you there beliefs and you followed them and were raised to believe it. but when you get older and learn more about science and what not its kinda hard to believe one can make all of this. i also believe there are living organisms outside earth.

I believe that when you use the Bible and science together to explain things it only makes the most sense. I believe it takes more faith to believe in evolution since nobody was around when the universe was created. The creationist has a way to go back in time to see how everything happened and that is the written word of God, who was there at the beginning. Both evolutionists and creationist all have the same evidence. They both use the same fossil layers etc. "in reality they are arguing about their interpretations based on their presuppositions." They are both arguging about the same evidence but looking at it through different glasses.
I used to think that the earth and universe was billions of years old too, but I only learned that from what I was spoon fed in school and in text books. Until I started really looking into the Bible and opposing views did I realize that the Bible does explain alot of what we are seeing today.

[2wheeler]

DaveH;200016 wrote:
Originally Posted by fallguy
Ethan, I am really sorry that I don't meet your expectation of what a true Christian should be. I'll work on that.

I think I get it now, there is no humor allowed when discussing religious things! I guess I wasn't aware of that. Or maybe you missed the smilie?

Seriously.
My bad. I quoted the wrong quote. I was referring to the Person A/Person B answer.

Please excuse my sin.....god did.

Oops....forgot......no humor allowed.

Seriously. :smiliewithmiddlefingersoutandkickingasupra:

[Parker]

fallguy;200040 wrote:
I believe that when you use the Bible and science together to explain things it only makes the most sense. I believe it takes more faith to believe in evolution since nobody was around when the universe was created. The creationist has a way to go back in time to see how everything happened and that is the written word of God, who was there at the beginning. Both evolutionists and creationist all have the same evidence. They both use the same fossil layers etc. "in reality they are arguing about their interpretations based on their presuppositions." They are both arguging about the same evidence but looking at it through different glasses.
I used to think that the earth and universe was billions of years old too, but I only learned that from what I was spoon fed in school and in text books. Until I started really looking into the Bible and opposing views did I realize that the Bible does explain alot of what we are seeing today.
heres the thing.... until i have that life changing eye opening moment... its going to be hard for me to truely believe... i want to believe, but until i have one of those moments... its just going to be hard

[fallguy]

Parker;200046 wrote:
heres the thing.... until i have that life changing eye opening moment... its going to be hard for me to truely believe... i want to believe, but until i have one of those moments... its just going to be hard

The funny thing is in the old testament the Israelites had all the miracles right before their eyes!They were witness to all the plagues, they were delivered from Eygpt, the walking across the Red sea on dry land, the water from the rock, and Lord providing manna and quail everyday to eat, and their clothes never getting old, and they still had issues following God everyday. In the new testament Christ performed many miracles and still many didn't believe. The proof you are wanting is in the Word and in the world if you just look. Just because a text book says that the earth and the universe is millions or billions of years old, doesn't make it true. There are many evolution scientist that have changed their views after studying the Word and applying the evidence. ie: no transistion forms have ever been found EVER!!

[2wheeler]

^^^^^^I get what yer sayin Matt.

Now, for Parker and myself, can you give an outstanding reason why we should believe your story (the bible), as opposed to other people's stories (textbooks)?

Both are just books.

[fallguy]

2wheeler;200048 wrote:
^^^^^^I get what yer sayin Matt.

Now, for Parker and myself, can you give an outstanding reason why we should believe your story (the bible), as opposed to other people's stories (textbooks)?

Both are just books.

"One such evidence that the Bible has been copied accurately in the past is shown in the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. These scrolls, found by a shepherd boy in 1947, are dated from 250 to 150 BC. This discovery pushed back our available oldest Scripture text almost 1,000 years. And when the content of the scrolls was compared to later copies, no significant differences were found. That means scribes had been copying with great precision for almost ten centuries. This amazing discovery moved us one millennium closer to the originals.

We can also make sound arguments for the trustworthiness of Scripture based on lower criticism, grammar, and contextual evidence. We can show that the scribes were meticulous in their copying of the text of Scripture. We can evidence the life-changing qualities of the Bible in the lives of millions of believers. We can evidence the historical accuracy of the text of the Bible.

But there is another, internal argument for the accuracy of Scripture, based on the character and attributes of God, and this argument is supreme.

The Scriptures claim that God Himself breathed out Scripture (using human instruments, 2 Peter 1:21) and that it can be trusted to be His Word. His wisdom is infinite, and He is all-powerful and holy, so everything He says is trustworthy, accurate, and without error. Since God’s work will image His own nature, the accuracy of Scripture is guaranteed.

But this argument goes even further, including the faithfulness of God to preserve the record of His work through Christ. God sent His own Son, the second person of the trinity, to take human form for the purpose of redemption. What was the cost of God’s incredible gift of salvation offered to man? His own Son’s life!

The Bible is the record of Christ’s coming, His payment for our sin, and all the truths we need to know about Him.

The nature, character, and attributes of God demand that the Scriptures be accurateSo here is a question. If God sent His Son, paid the highest price imaginable for the redemption of human beings, and made a record so all future generations could know, would He allow the text to be adulterated and the message ruined by error? Impossible!

If God allowed the text to be lost and the message to be muddled, He would then be unfaithful to His own purpose and to His own Son and His sacrifice on the Cross. Logically, theoretically, practically, that is impossible.

God will not and cannot allow the record of the perfect work of His Son to be lost to mankind. Otherwise, He would void—for succeeding generations—the payment of His Son, Jesus Christ.

The nature, character, and attributes of God demand a faithful witness of His decrees, promise, plan, and purpose, climaxed in the death, burial, and resurrection of His Son"

They both require faith to believe what is in them is true. I choose to believe in God's book vs some book written by his creation that opposes him.

[2wheeler]

^^^^^^ Would you please post the source.

[fallguy]

This website has a ton of information supporting the creationist view point.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

but this is where is quoted the above from.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n4/biblical-authority-god-said

[thrash]

The Case for Christ covers this.

The bible's accuracy can only be described as "supernaturally" accurate from a information processing perspective.

Visual Studio 2002 is one of the first products we (MS) started shipping on DVDs. When you press a DVD there's a 1 in 1 billion chance of having a 1 bit error. However, a SL/SS DVD has 4 GB, meaning there are 32 billion bits on one. That means that statistically every DVD we press is going to have 32 bits worth of errors on it. It turns out that we had a much higher media failure rate than we expected with VS 2002, all due to this issue of a 1 in 1 billino chance of a 1 bit error.

The bible was hand copied, hand translated. It spread throughout the world faster than any book. It was translated into more languages than any other book. Everything in the bible was retold orally (as per the Jewish tradition) from the time of Jesus life to the time something was first committed to paper about 110 years later.

Yet what we see from all the bibles all over the world in all of its languages, is that there is essentially no content difference at all

That's unheard of in all of the history of recorded word. That's just one reason why the bible is special and why you can trust your life to it.

Like I said -- the Case for Christ lays it all out beautifully. I'll lend anyone that's interested a copy of the book.

[Parker]

how do we not know the bible is some delusional ranting of some old man? is there anyway we can disprove that? is there anyway we can disprove eveolution? disprove a god?

no.... we do not know enough about ouselves let alonethisw world or a god that we never see or can prove exists... yes you can say look around you, with all the complex stuff (plants, animals) you have to believe that theres a god... well no you dont... i look outside and see a rabbit that has evolved to shed its fur in place of a whiter coat for more protection from preadators... i shall rant more later

[2wheeler]

fallguy;200056 wrote:
This website has a ton of information supporting the creationist view point.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

but this is where is quoted the above from.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n4/biblical-authority-god-said

I guess I was looking to see if you had any original ideas on the topic.

I wish I could give all of my answers by copy and pasting someone else's argument.

That's one thing I really like about my point of view on this subject. It's mine. I can change it whenever I feel. It seems like you guys have no "freedom of opinion". It seems as though your opinion has been taught to you.