N.D. Highway Patrol looking for speeding motorcycle

[Guest]

only 131 deleted posts...come on wes, I expected more from you.

[KA-T_240]

This post is deleted!

[King Ricer]

weshole;220980 wrote:
I totally agree. I bet this fool wasn't speeding.

i think he was doing 55 when that happened!

[Hammy]

srsly, who rides a motorcycle with no shoes on! j/k

[Rexwagon]

Where they hell did you find those pictures

[JN210]

at least he was wearing a helmet:)

[No_Boundaries45]

The funny part is the guy survived the actual crash part...he's just unconscious in those pics. He died later in the hospital. and what i heard is he was goin like 75.

[No_Boundaries45]

JN210;221033 wrote:
at least he was wearing a helmet:)

yeah but (honest to god)..when they pulled him out of there...the helmit was cracked so much it just split apart and hit the ground...pretty scary shit.

[Parker]

No_Boundaries45;221069 wrote:
yeah but (honest to god)..when they pulled him out of there...the helmit was cracked so much it just split apart and hit the ground...pretty scary shit.
"Investigators say evidence shows the cyclist was going about 120 miles per hour at the time of the impact."

[Burthwick]

anyone get a name?

[Burthwick]

check it out

http://www.pbnation.com/showthread.php?referrerid=210641&t=2298667

[Guest]

Damn, that's crazy. I've seen this pictures before, long ago, but they were dismissed on forums as being fake. Amazing there isn't more blood, but I'm assuming his brain smashed into his skull, causing his death, and not an external hemorrhage.

[Guest]

Anyone seen this?

http://fileclouds.com/cars/porsche_911_crash/
http://www.srtforums.com/forums/f348/teen-girl-crashes-porsche-100mph-nws-309486/

[Guest]

tjamz;220951 wrote:
Remember, in ND if you rear end someone it is ALWAYS the fault of the trailing vehicle. ALWAYS.

Source?

[MisterCMK]

ND Century Code

[Guest]

tjamz;220951 wrote:
alright...I got through post 75ish and got bored.....

If I see you coming up on my tail at 150mph, I WILL pull into your lane and slam on the brakes. I get high on that type of stuff...gets the adrenaline pumping you know...will he make it or will he not? That is the question. Remember, in ND if you rear end someone it is ALWAYS the fault of the trailing vehicle. ALWAYS.

I see where you're coming from, but that rule did not hold true for someone I know b/c roadrage was involved.

[Guest]

Although I'm not a lawyer, I also don't think the same rules would apply if you knowingly swerve into another person's lane with the intent to harm. I wonder if Mr. Jamz would slam on his brakes if a car/truck/semi were speeding behind him?

[DelSlow]

tjamz;220951 wrote:
Remember, in ND if you rear end someone it is ALWAYS the fault of the trailing vehicle. ALWAYS.

No, not true.

[Guest]

MisterCMK;221141 wrote:
ND Century Code

Here I was hoping for a cited source, linked so I didn't have to dig. While I generally would agree, I disagree with the statement that it's always the rear-ending driver's fault. Who is to say someone doesn't just slam on their brakes in front of another car in order to cash in on insurance/sue?

[Burthwick]

ND States that whoever rear-ends a car ahead of them REGARDLESS of how it went about, it's ALWAYS the person that hit the persons fault. I'd know. I got brake checked, rear-ended the lil bastard and it was "my fault".