N.D. Highway Patrol looking for speeding motorcycle
-
The funny part is the guy survived the actual crash part...he's just unconscious in those pics. He died later in the hospital. and what i heard is he was goin like 75.
-
JN210;221033 wrote:
at least he was wearing a helmet:)yeah but (honest to god)..when they pulled him out of there...the helmit was cracked so much it just split apart and hit the ground...pretty scary shit.
-
No_Boundaries45;221069 wrote:
yeah but (honest to god)..when they pulled him out of there...the helmit was cracked so much it just split apart and hit the ground...pretty scary shit.
"Investigators say evidence shows the cyclist was going about 120 miles per hour at the time of the impact." -
-
Damn, that's crazy. I've seen this pictures before, long ago, but they were dismissed on forums as being fake. Amazing there isn't more blood, but I'm assuming his brain smashed into his skull, causing his death, and not an external hemorrhage.
-
tjamz;220951 wrote:
Remember, in ND if you rear end someone it is ALWAYS the fault of the trailing vehicle. ALWAYS.Source?
-
tjamz;220951 wrote:
alright...I got through post 75ish and got bored.....If I see you coming up on my tail at 150mph, I WILL pull into your lane and slam on the brakes. I get high on that type of stuff...gets the adrenaline pumping you know...will he make it or will he not? That is the question. Remember, in ND if you rear end someone it is ALWAYS the fault of the trailing vehicle. ALWAYS.
I see where you're coming from, but that rule did not hold true for someone I know b/c roadrage was involved.
-
Although I'm not a lawyer, I also don't think the same rules would apply if you knowingly swerve into another person's lane with the intent to harm. I wonder if Mr. Jamz would slam on his brakes if a car/truck/semi were speeding behind him?
-
MisterCMK;221141 wrote:
ND Century CodeHere I was hoping for a cited source, linked so I didn't have to dig. While I generally would agree, I disagree with the statement that it's always the rear-ending driver's fault. Who is to say someone doesn't just slam on their brakes in front of another car in order to cash in on insurance/sue?
-
Well now we have a he said, he said argument. I vote we settle this by way of an old-fashioned duel!
-
Burthwick;221150 wrote:
ND States that whoever rear-ends a car ahead of them REGARDLESS of how it went about, it's ALWAYS the person that hit the persons fault. I'd know. I got brake checked, rear-ended the lil bastard and it was "my fault".Nope
not ALWAYS. I know for a fact -
Burthwick;221158 wrote:
ND sucks! Thank god I reside in MNAhhh Minnesota, the state where you are partially at fault if someone hits your car, even if parked, because "you were there" and insurance companies are scam artists.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login