2010 m3 gts..wow

[legacy-user-33]

The wing completes the car...gts!

[Eurofan]

Cobra Rob;293366 wrote:
sweet color gay wing

I think alot of that has to do with the stigma attached to spoilers.

For the most part wings like these are on piece of shit hondas and have zero function

That aside realize that in this case it is for functionality... And in all honesty it doesnt look that bad when you disregard shit heads who think there hondas are track cars

Take a look at the m3 gt4 and the Porsche Gt3
http://993c4s.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/2010-gt3-rs-3.jpg

http://www.wallpapergate.com/data/media/1504/BMW_M3_Race_Version_2009_widesreen_1680_1050.jpg

[DelSlow]

I love that you use the 'Race Version.'

The horizontal fins help stabilize it. Much like:

is designed after;

[DrifterExtreme]

Eurofan;293383 wrote:
I think alot of that has to do with the stigma attached to spoilers.

For the most part wings like these are on piece of shit hondas and have zero function

That aside realize that in this case it is for functionality... And in all honesty it doesnt look that bad when you disregard shit heads who think there hondas are track cars

Take a look at the m3 gt4 and the Porsche Gt3
http://993c4s.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/2010-gt3-rs-3.jpg

http://www.wallpapergate.com/data/media/1504/BMW_M3_Race_Version_2009_widesreen_1680_1050.jpg

You sound more and more like a fucking yuppie douche bag with every post.

What the hell do you think the Integra type R, S2000 CR, NSX, etc.... are? Track cars made for the street.

Like do you really think only expensive euro cars are the "only" worthy cars?

[Eurofan]

DrifterExtreme;293385 wrote:
You sound more and more like a fucking yuppie douche bag with every post.

What the hell do you think the Integra type R, S2000 CR, NSX, etc.... are? Track cars made for the street.

Like do you really think only expensive euro cars are the "only" worthy cars?

A yuppie douche bag hu???

Lmao.. wow

I was refering to the the many honda civics with wings on them... The vast majority of hondas are NOT track cars. The majority of Euro cars are much more able on tracks. There is no arguing that.. Quit being a jackass.

[DelSlow]

So you're comparing people with riced out Hondas...to Euro cars lol.

I love this argument.

"Hondas/Nissians/Mitsubishis are not track cars. Euros are more track cars."

[DelSlow]

PS.

Eurofan;293386 wrote:
The majority of Euro cars are much more able on tracks. There is no arguing that..

Why?

You do know that like 85% of 'Euro Cars' are this right?

[Eurofan]

DelSlow;293388 wrote:
PS.

Why?

You do know that like 85% of 'Euro Cars' are this right?

Touche' but let's keep the info relevant to our country/region.

Factory vs factory euros win. 95% of the time. That being said they do it a premium cost the majority of the time, but the fact still remains: euros are better track cars.

[DelSlow]

Eurofan;293408 wrote:
Factory vs factory euros win. 95% of the time. That being said they do it a premium cost the majority of the time, but the fact still remains: euros are better track cars.

Once again...Why? What are you basing this off of? Try maybe backing up what you say?

[Eurofan]

DelSlow;293409 wrote:
Once again...Why? What are you basing this off of? Try maybe backing up what you say?

0-60 times
1/4 mile times
Track times

Ummmm Everything???

[DelSlow]

What cars? Lets see some info since we can all agree on that, right?

[capitlj]

I think what he's getting at Is that in each class, let's take midsize sedans, like the 3 series and accord for example, the German made cars are better on the track. However that same arguement applies to the other side of the equation if we change the class, 370Z versus 1 series. So umm yeah what are you talking about?

[Eurofan]

DelSlow;293413 wrote:
What cars? Lets see some info since we can all agree on that, right?

I am not going to waste my life compiling 0-60 times on every single European car along with all the Jap cars..> But I can PROMISE you it wouldnt be a competition.

Stop arguing.

The only reason they do this is because they cost more.

But once again the fact remains: Euro cars are better track cars from the FACTORY in general

[Bp-08]

DelSlow;293388 wrote:
PS.

Why?

You do know that like 85% of 'Euro Cars' are this right?

LOL a lecar, used to have 2 of them out at the farm. Shitty little car.

[Cobra Rob]

Eurofan;293408 wrote:
Touche' but let's keep the info relevant to our country/region.

Factory vs factory euros win. 95% of the time. That being said they do it a premium cost the majority of the time, but the fact still remains: euros are better track cars.

like a premium $300 oil change:)

[SPANISH-RICE]

Eurofan;293386 wrote:
<u>A yuppie douche bag hu??? </u> yes you are

The vast majority of hondas are NOT track cars. The **majority **of Euro cars are much more able on tracks. There is no arguing that.. Quit being a jackass.

lmao.. two closely priced choices

honda has had a race trim model of almost every model they make for almost 40 years. with huge factory options to make them even more race inspired. accordR civicR integraR nsxrr s2000cr the only thing they dont have is a crv, pilot, and odyssey from their "truck" category.

what majority of race inpired vehicles does vw and friends have over honda? yes some of them have a SUPERCAR form of a few vehicles. but not that youll find driving around with any majority. especially in the U.S.

[Eurofan]

SPANISH-RICE;293420 wrote:
lmao.. two closely priced choices

honda has had a race trim model of almost every model they make for almost 40 years. with huge factory options to make them even more race inspired. accordR civicR integraR nsxrr s2000cr the only thing they dont have is a crv, pilot, and odyssey from their "truck" category.

what majority of race inpired vehicles does vw and friends have over honda? yes some of them have a SUPERCAR form of a few vehicles. but not that youll find driving around with any majority. especially in the U.S.

Take a look at the bmw x5m the x6m.... The M3, the m5, the m6.... The s4, s5, rs6.... Lol just stop.

Like I have been saying. They do this at double the cost...

But the fact still remains: Euro cars are better on the track

[DelSlow]

Eurofan;293423 wrote:
But the **fact **still remains: Euro cars are better on the track

Why? Because you think the track times are better? Still don't see a __ vs. ___ (that accounts for most Euro cars) comparison to back up what you say. Here ill start;
**
1990 BMW E30 M3**
195 hp
170 ft/lbs.
143mph top speed
5.5 sec (0-50)

2006 Ford GT
550 hp
500 ft/lbs.
205mph top speed
3.3 sec (0-60)

Well people think its pretty obviously that Euro cars blow. Right?

To me sounds like you're just a eUrO fan boi that is just blabbing an opinion?

But the fact still remains: Eurofan is a yuppie.

[SPANISH-RICE]

Eurofan;293423 wrote:
Take a look at the bmw x5m the x6m.... The M3, the m5, the m6.... The s4, s5, rs6.... Lol just stop.

Like I have been saying. They do this at double the cost...

But the fact still remains: Euro cars are better on the track

how is that majority? where are your numbers for our questions?

[Eurofan]

Lol.. You guys are not looking at this right...

I am not talking about just the big hyped up cars...

I am talking about the base model cars vs base model cars

The Audi a4
The BMW 128/328i
The Merc c-class
The Saab 9-3's
VS
The Honda Civics
The Toyota corollas
The Nissan altima 2.5's
Ect ect.