95 v6 stang #'s
-
:eek: :eek: holy shit!
-
that's nice i would mind having that one!
-
Something is WAY off. a 95 V6 stang will in no way shape or form dyno 226 rwhp STOCK. Hell, a 95 V8 put s down about 220-230 rwhp. Something is fishy.
EDIT: on a MUSTANG dyno none the less. Hell on a mustang dyno MY car stock would dyno around 220 rwhp.
This thing would be pushing around 260 rwhp on a dynojet, about 650 rwhp with the mods
All on stock internals? Something is REALLY fishy here. I'm not buying it.
-
94NDTA wrote:
Something is WAY off. a 95 V6 stang will in no way shape or form dyno 226 rwhp STOCK. Hell, a 95 V8 put s down about 220-230 rwhp. Something is fishy.EDIT: on a MUSTANG dyno none the less. Hell on a mustang dyno MY car stock would dyno around 220 rwhp.
This thing would be pushing around 260 rwhp on a dynojet, about 650 rwhp with the mods
All on stock internals? Something is REALLY fishy here. I'm not buying it.
your just mad because it would beat your car, JK
-
97Cav wrote:
your just mad because it would beat your car, JK
The truth comes out
Actually, I'm just trying to clear some things up.
Now it that were a 4.6L instead of a 3.8L, I might beleive it. It's still a hefty load to be putting on a stock bottom end though.
-
thats is pretty nice, pretty nice mod list also
-
94NDTA wrote:
Something is WAY off. a 95 V6 stang will in no way shape or form dyno 226 rwhp STOCK. Hell, a 95 V8 put s down about 220-230 rwhp. Something is fishy.EDIT: on a MUSTANG dyno none the less. Hell on a mustang dyno MY car stock would dyno around 220 rwhp.
This thing would be pushing around 260 rwhp on a dynojet, about 650 rwhp with the mods
All on stock internals? Something is REALLY fishy here. I'm not buying it.
Its a 3.8 stock, its bored out to 4.2
-
-
I have heard about these V6 stangs making great power from being turbocharged Otherwise it is uber hard to make any power with them even with a supercharger.
-
The guy that tuned my car in Winnipeg, Ed Hohenberg at wolfperformance.com was telling me he was able to tune a V6 to about 270HP. That was with headwork, cams, exhaust, and intake. It is pretty realistic, I think. I don't know why anyone wouldn't just buy a 5.0 or 4.6 and put in the car, but to each his own.
-
03SVT wrote:
The guy that tuned my car in Winnipeg, Ed Hohenberg at wolfperformance.com was telling me he was able to tune a V6 to about 270HP. That was with headwork, cams, exhaust, and intake. It is pretty realistic, I think. I don't know why anyone wouldn't just buy a 5.0 or 4.6 and put in the car, but to each his own.270 crank I sure hope... and even that requires some explaining IMO....
-
Yeah it does those 3.8's are weak as hell I beat one in my mom's Lumina for Christ's sake.
-
dubbsy wrote:
270 crank I sure hope... and even that requires some explaining IMO....The guy is probably one of the better tuners in North America and he tuned it. It was WHP. I don' t know how he did it, but he, like myself, have absolutely no reason to make up stories.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login