Interesting

[Pony_Racer]

2wheeler wrote:
Top Fuels are in the 5.90s.

I've seen TF's in the 4.6's....5.90s are about average, i'm assuming your going by average and not by fastest times.

[94NDTA]

Pony_Racer wrote:
I've seen TF's in the 4.6's....5.90s are about average, i'm assuming your going by average and not by fastest times.
Top Fuel BIKES? I've never heard of a bike going that fast.

[2wheeler]

Pony_Racer wrote:
I've seen TF's in the 4.6's....5.90s are about average, i'm assuming your going by average and not by fastest times.

I'm assuming you have no idea what I'm talking about. No bikes have gone 4.6s. Top Fuel Dragsters(which I'm assuming you're talking about) have been in the 4.4s. The bikes that run at the same events are PRO STOCK bikes. They have been 6.99(Andrew Hines, '05). In AMA PROSTAR(not NHRA), there are Top Fuel Bikes(Funnybikes). They have been in the 5.9s(Larry McBride, '04), and no, 5.9s are not average.

Clear as mud?

[Pony_Racer]

No i was talking about dragsters..not bikes. My bad didnt know you were still talking bikes. 5.90s actually are roughly average if you factor in the bad run times and what not. And i wasnt talking about all of Top Fuel averages everywhere just using a random race in TN.

[dubbsy]

Fargo wrote:
Ok but that is in the works for next winter....I would have no time in the summer, gone too much

gonna put the 5.0 and Procharger back in?

(or a 12-71?)

(and when are you back-halfing the car?)

[Pony_Racer]

5.0+Procharger=AWWWW YEAH

[dubbsy]

Pony_Racer wrote:
5.0+Procharger=AWWWW YEAH

haha. that wasn't a bad setup he had in there.... but it ain't got shit on the current "thing" rattlin' under the hood.

[XJHEAD]

dubbsy wrote:
(and when are you back-halfing the car?)

Not this car

[dubbsy]

Fargo wrote:
Not this car

are you building something else now too? there's already too much power in the front of that poor cobra.

[XJHEAD]

Never enough

[dubbsy]

Sure hope the welds on that cage are strong. Gonna be the only thing holding that car together.