Dyno in Fargo May 12 & 13
-
DrifterExtreme wrote:
What s2000 have you seen put down more with a cai. That is pretty good for an ap1 s2000(2.0L). So i think it is a pretty strong motor.I wasn't saying I've seen an S2000 motor put down more with just a CAI, I was simply commenting that it lost 1/6th of its crank power to the wheels. I guess I just expected a little more maybe?
I guess it's roughly 17% loss which isn't horrible but maybe it seems worse than it is...idk
-
camzaro28 wrote:
well torbs was there. he put down less then he was expecting.understatement of the year...i gata figure out what's going on...put down stock power (113whp)...with 10.8:1 compression, zex 59300 stg. 2 cam, full race header, and ITBs...and that was on the stock ECU, couldnt get crome to work @ all...not a very good day to say the least...I don't get it though, unless the ITBs are really fucking something up, vtec isnt working right, or my motor is just getting weak (which could be the case, it was smoking a bit at the beginning, but by the 3rd run it wasnt smoking anymore)...time to do a comp. test. Anybody got a y8 vtec solonoid I could borrow for like 1/2 hr. just to check and see if mine is working correctly? thanks
-
DrifterExtreme wrote:
My s2000 put down 200 hp and 137 ft/lbs of torque. I was pretty happy with the numbers being it's stock with an intake.That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...? -
Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?honestly tho, its really only like 17% drivetrain loss which isnt horrible...it seems worse than it really is
-
Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?Are you serious?.....240/153 are at the FLYWHEEL, while my 200/137 is at the WHEELS. so there not that bad concidering the loss throgh the drivetrain.
-
Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?
Ahahaha, ummmm....PWN3D yourself! -
Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?we are talking whp, not bhp...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login