rotarys what??

[squawsnatch]

zac..................if only the noobs knew what the stock na rear end was capable of.

[zbrown]

squawsnatch;222296 wrote:
zac..................if only the noobs knew what the stock na rear end was capable of.

9.4 @ 140+???

.
.
.
.
.
.
I fibbed a bit, that was completely stock TII diff, axles, suspension....

I know of NA rears in low 10s though

[Parker]

zbrown;222297 wrote:
9.4 @ 140+???

.
.
.
.
.
.
I fibbed a bit, that was completely stock TII diff, axles, suspension....

I know of NA rears in low 10s though
lol... thats the solid axle under that... n00b..

[Parker]

squawsnatch;222296 wrote:
zac..................if only the noobs knew what the stock na rear end was capable of.
lol @ u.... im pretty sure i of all people here knows what the staock n/a rear diff is good too... its good to the tens, yes... But... wheel hop is the enemy in most cases

[zbrown]

Parker;222299 wrote:
lol... thats the solid axle under that... n00b..

hmmmm...

looks to me like the wheels are toed in big time........ how does that happen on a solid axe....

parker = noob

and that car DID do a 9.40 @ 142 on a stock TII rear, halfshafts, and suspension.....

it is backhalved now yes

[weshole]

zbrown;222307 wrote:
hmmmm...

looks to me like the wheels are toed in big time........ how does that happen on a solid axe....

parker = noob

and that car DID do a 9.40 @ 142 on a stock TII rear, halfshafts, and suspension.....

it is backhalved now yes

Speaking of N00bs, it's not "toe" that your looking at there is camber my friend. And it is definately showing negative camber. Indicative of an independent rear suspension.

[SPANISH-RICE]

weshole;222309 wrote:
Speaking of N00bs, it's not "toe" that your looking at there is camber my friend. And it is definately showing negative camber.

pwnd

[jdm-az-yo]

+1 for slow sauce haha jk

[Parker]

zbrown;222307 wrote:
hmmmm...

looks to me like the wheels are toed in big time........ how does that happen on a solid axe....

parker = noob

and that car DID do a 9.40 @ 142 on a stock TII rear, halfshafts, and suspension.....

it is backhalved now yes
lol... thats katorx7's car (v8rx7forum)... and that pass in the picture was done on a granny's solid axle kit.. you are basing the front to the rear... just looks like a solid axle too me..

[zbrown]

weshole;222309 wrote:
Speaking of N00bs, it's not "toe" that your looking at there is camber my friend. And it is definately showing negative camber. Indicative of an independent rear suspension.

thanks for keeping me in line

[z31]

That is not a solid rear axle, unless it's bent. :icon_scratch:

IRS can hold a lot of power. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf4R0Ba_zHQ

[Parker]

z31;222418 wrote:
That is not a solid rear axle, unless it's bent. :icon_scratch:

IRS can hold a lot of power. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf4R0Ba_zHQ
lol... that does not look like an rx7 with a 7'' ring gear...

and yes... the rear looks like its cambering in... if you compare it to the <u>front, that is about ready to lift</u>... but prove me wrong.. run a 9 second pass on a 7'' ring gear and shut me up:icon_cheers:

[Afsil80]

The REAL question:

How many N/A rear ends will you go through before you decide to go with something different?

[Parker]

Afsil80;222510 wrote:
The REAL question:

How many N/A rear ends will you go through before you decide to go with something different?
hopefuly none