What Modern American Muscle Car would you rather have?
-
capitlj;324921 wrote:
As opposed to the Chevrolet you can't see out of, or the bloated cow that is the Challenger. I'd still take my chances with the Mustang.I'll agree with that! I sat in one at the stealership the other day, and you really can't see much at all over your shoulders in that car. Prolly not as bad as the 1970's fastback mustangs, but still really bad.
-
GarageAlchemist;324932 wrote:
I'll agree with that! I sat in one at the stealership the other day, and you really can't see much at all over your shoulders in that car. Prolly not as bad as the 1970's fastback mustangs, but still really bad.Yup no headroom at all in that thing, I could never actually own one. The challenger I love the way it looks but its so overweight.
Joel;324929 wrote:
Until they come out with a v6 EcoBoost Stang!!?!?!?! I wish.Word on the street is... soon.
Oh and as a side note that firebird is hawt.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
capitlj;324940 wrote:
Yup no headroom at all in that thing, I could never actually own one. The challenger I love the way it looks but its so overweight.And it wasn't in original form? I was always under the impression those things were tanks back in the day, comparatively speaking.
-
CTS-V would have been in if it's price tag wasn't almost double what the mustang is..And its not really a muscle car...
-
i vote none of the above. But if forced to pick one the camaro ss would be my choice. there pretty badass looking and we all know gm can make a good engine.
-
Joel;324929 wrote:
If I were to buy a mustang, bang for your buck I would get the V6... 300hp and 30mpg with a sweet looking car... sign me up. Out of the choice here, i've picked the Mustang 5.0. Until they come out with a v6 EcoBoost Stang!!?!?!?! I wish.The main problem with the V6 Mustangs is that its a lot of car for that engine.
305 horsepower, yes.. but their Torque numbers are tiny compared to even a mustang GT from 99-04. If I wanted a vehicle that could look nice and get my great MPG though, I agree 100%.
If I could choose, I would go Challenger. Mainly because I feel they were the ones who nailed the whole "Retro" look off the bat. Its literally a box... and thats what they were. The interior could use some more bedazzle, but the car itself looks amazing.
> bubba;306060 wrote:
> i vote hookers and blow
-
Definitely the camaro im more of a chevy guy rather then ford or mopar.
-
-
PSiedTSi;324941 wrote:
And it wasn't in original form? I was always under the impression those things were tanks back in the day, comparatively speaking.I'm not comparing it to the original just its current competition as the op states.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
torbs;325020 wrote:
None of the Above.CTS-V Wagon
not a muscle car, and also not in this price range. Is it so hard to just pick from the choices and NOT come up with your own off the wall idea?
-
Base price of $63,000 Ummm I think I'll take two mustangs please. Or a GT500 with 15 grand left over to mod it.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
I voted for the mustang. Challengers are just too big for me, and the camaros look a bit blocky. The pontiac conversions make them look better, but the mustangs in blue look awesome. I'd just as soon buy one of the V6 cars and put a procharger on it than buy a 5.0 car. Might end up costing more than a V8 car in the end but it something different.
And CTS-V's are great. They are one of the few good looking cars that are built today. CTS's stand out, its one good thing Cadillac has done sice the 70's. They dont look like all other GM cars. Besides, every single asian luxury car looks about as exciting as a blade of grass, and the germans aren't far behind. Comparing a CTS V to a mustang cant really be done. You get 50% more car, sizewise and comfort, thats why its 50% more. Its like comparing a S10 to a new Ford Raptor.
Or I can save the 40 grand and build an awesome pro touring '67 cougar or something along those lines and forget new stuff.
Whats fuel injection?
Stuck with buick V6's.
81 Cutlass- Drawthrough turbo 6
97 Firebird- FWD motor turned the right way, Supercharged 3800
CTS-V
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login