nsx engine?
-
Have fun haha.
-
spoolude wrote:
ok the nsx is a rear wheel drive car so that means u would have to make the rsx a rear wheel drive witch costs lots o money u should have sombody in town build u a LS v-tec they make lots of power but cost alot to do or somthing like thatso you're telling him to sell his k20 motor to run an ls/vtec? that's one of the more retarded things I've ever heard. look into the power potential of your k20 motor, you have a good platform to build off of.
-
btleier wrote:
so you're telling him to sell his k20 motor to run an ls/vtec? that's one of the more retarded things I've ever heard. look into the power potential of your k20 motor, you have a good platform to build off of.explan k20 i dont know what it is
-
buy a honda civic and put the k20 motor in it....have you ever seen a civic with a 6 speed?? that would be awesome.
-
I almost did a k20 swap into my 7th gen civic , lots of money but I was going to go through with it, but it was a LOT cheaper just to get the wrx and run better times with that.
-
Bryce, that kind of compression would require low boost (which is the likely route) or a ridiculously high octane fuel. Although you'd probably see a rod punch a hole through the block before you'd experience detonation. The K24 would be better for a turbo, although I'm fairly certain that AFR is around the 10.0:1 mark as well.
2005 Mercedes-Benz C240 4Matic
1993 Mazda Rx-7 Twin Turbo (sold)
-
boost magazine (from car & driver i think...) put a supercharger on the k20 and ran like 4.7 psi. actually, there have a been some arguments on honda-tech about which is better for a turbo: high or low compression. low compression means more boost for xxxhp with significant lag, whereas higher compression means less boost for xxxhp with a little less lag. i think the #'s were 9:1 vs 10:1
granted, many other factors come into play (fuel mainly), but that was the basis for the argument -
Here is where I got my infromation.
-
out there wrote:
boost magazine (from car & driver i think...) put a supercharger on the k20 and ran like 4.7 psi. actually, there have a been some arguments on honda-tech about which is better for a turbo: high or low compression. low compression means more boost for xxxhp with significant lag, whereas higher compression means less boost for xxxhp with a little less lag. i think the #'s were 9:1 vs 10:1
granted, many other factors come into play (fuel mainly), but that was the basis for the argumentHigh Boost + High Compression = High Horsepower (teh win), but the problem runs with detonation. Which is why you'd need race fuel to counter it.
My original impression was that the K24A was in base, and the high revving VTEC K20 was in type S. Like in Preludes. But I guess both base and type S have a different version of the same engine, K20x.
2005 Mercedes-Benz C240 4Matic
1993 Mazda Rx-7 Twin Turbo (sold) -
the k20 is in the regular RSX and has 160 hp
and the k24 is in the Type S and has 200 hp
from what i have heard and seen i must be wrong. -
if ur going to do a motor swap get a h22 i have one and they pull like nothing eles
-
spoolude wrote:
if ur going to do a motor swap get a h22 i have one and they pull like nothing elesI for one beg to differ....
-
nvsgsx...nope the type s is still a 2liter
why would he swap from a 200hp k20 to an H22?
doesnt the k20 have something different like i-VTEC...im not sure what exactly has changed but id like to see someone mess around with that motor a little bit and i bet youd get some good results...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login